Chamorro María Eugenia, Wenker Shirley Denise, Vota Daiana Marina, Vittori Daniela Cecilia, Nesse Alcira Beatriz
Departamento de Química Biológica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Aug;1833(8):1960-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
It is now recognized that in addition to its activity upon erythroid progenitor cells, erythropoietin (Epo) is capable of stimulating survival of different non-erythroid cells. Since stimulation of erythropoiesis is unwanted for neuroprotection, Epo-like compounds with a more selective action are under investigation. Although the carbamylated derivative of erythropoietin (cEpo) has demonstrated non-hematopoietic tissue protection without erythropoietic effect, little is known about differential mechanisms between Epo and cEpo. Therefore, we investigated signaling pathways which play a key role in Epo-induced proliferation. Here we show that cEpo blocked FOXO3a phosphorylation, allowing expression of downstream target p27(kip1) in UT-7 and TF-1 cells capable of erythroid differentiation. This is consistent with the involvement of cEpo in slowing down G1-to-S-phase progression compared with the effect of Epo upon cell cycle. In contrast, similar antiapoptotic actions of cEpo and Epo were observed in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells. Inhibition and competition assays suggest that Epo may act through both, the homodimeric (EpoR/EpoR) and the heterodimeric (EpoR/βcR) receptors in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells and probably in the TF-1 cell type as well. Results also indicate that cEpo needs both the EpoR and βcR subunits to prevent apoptosis of neuronal cells. Based on evidence suggesting that cell proliferation pathways were involved in the differential effect of Epo and cEpo, we went forward to studying downstream signals. Here we provide the first evidence that unlike Epo, cEpo failed to induce FOXO3a inactivation and subsequent p27(kip1) downregulation, which is clearly shown in the incapacity of cEpo to induce erythroid cell growth.
现在已经认识到,除了对红系祖细胞有活性外,促红细胞生成素(Epo)还能够刺激不同非红系细胞的存活。由于刺激红细胞生成对于神经保护是不必要的,因此正在研究具有更选择性作用的Epo样化合物。尽管促红细胞生成素的氨甲酰化衍生物(cEpo)已显示出非造血组织保护作用而无促红细胞生成作用,但对于Epo和cEpo之间的差异机制知之甚少。因此,我们研究了在Epo诱导的增殖中起关键作用的信号通路。在这里我们表明,cEpo阻断了FOXO3a的磷酸化,使得能够进行红系分化的UT-7和TF-1细胞中下游靶标p27(kip1)得以表达。这与cEpo参与减缓G1期到S期的进程一致,与Epo对细胞周期的影响相比。相反,在神经元SH-SY5Y细胞中观察到cEpo和Epo具有相似的抗凋亡作用。抑制和竞争试验表明,Epo可能通过同二聚体(EpoR/EpoR)和异二聚体(EpoR/βcR)受体在神经元SH-SY5Y细胞中起作用,可能在TF-1细胞类型中也是如此。结果还表明,cEpo需要EpoR和βcR亚基来防止神经元细胞凋亡。基于有证据表明细胞增殖途径参与了Epo和cEpo的差异作用,我们进而研究下游信号。在这里我们提供了首个证据,即与Epo不同,cEpo未能诱导FOXO3a失活以及随后的p27(kip1)下调,这在cEpo无法诱导红系细胞生长中得到了明确体现。