Brines Michael, Grasso Giovanni, Fiordaliso Fabio, Sfacteria Alessandra, Ghezzi Pietro, Fratelli Maddalena, Latini Roberto, Xie Qiao-Wen, Smart John, Su-Rick Chiao-Ju, Pobre Eileen, Diaz Deborah, Gomez Daniel, Hand Carla, Coleman Thomas, Cerami Anthony
Kenneth S. Warren Institute, Ossining, NY 10563, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14907-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406491101. Epub 2004 Sep 29.
The cytokine erythropoietin (Epo) is tissue-protective in preclinical models of ischemic, traumatic, toxic, and inflammatory injuries. We have recently characterized Epo derivatives that do not bind to the Epo receptor (EpoR) yet are tissue-protective. For example, carbamylated Epo (CEpo) does not stimulate erythropoiesis, yet it prevents tissue injury in a wide variety of in vivo and in vitro models. These observations suggest that another receptor is responsible for the tissue-protective actions of Epo. Notably, prior investigation suggests that EpoR physically interacts with the common beta receptor (betacR), the signal-transducing subunit shared by the granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, and the IL-3 and IL-5 receptors. However, because betacR knockout mice exhibit normal erythrocyte maturation, betacR is not required for erythropoiesis. We hypothesized that betacR in combination with the EpoR expressed by nonhematopoietic cells constitutes a tissue-protective receptor. In support of this hypothesis, membrane proteins prepared from rat brain, heart, liver, or kidney were greatly enriched in EpoR after passage over either Epo or CEpo columns but covalently bound in a complex with betacR. Further, antibodies against EpoR coimmunoprecipitated betacR from membranes prepared from neuronal-like P-19 cells that respond to Epo-induced tissue protection. Immunocytochemical studies of spinal cord neurons and cardiomyocytes protected by Epo demonstrated cellular colocalization of Epo betacR and EpoR. Finally, as predicted by the hypothesis, neither Epo nor CEpo was active in cardiomyocyte or spinal cord injury models performed in the betacR knockout mouse. These data support the concept that EpoR and betacR comprise a tissue-protective heteroreceptor.
细胞因子促红细胞生成素(Epo)在缺血性、创伤性、中毒性和炎性损伤的临床前模型中具有组织保护作用。我们最近鉴定了一些促红细胞生成素衍生物,它们不与促红细胞生成素受体(EpoR)结合,但仍具有组织保护作用。例如,氨甲酰化促红细胞生成素(CEpo)不刺激红细胞生成,但在多种体内和体外模型中可预防组织损伤。这些观察结果表明,另一种受体负责促红细胞生成素的组织保护作用。值得注意的是,先前的研究表明,EpoR与共同β受体(betacR)发生物理相互作用,betacR是粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子以及IL-3和IL-5受体共有的信号转导亚基。然而,由于betacR基因敲除小鼠表现出正常的红细胞成熟,所以红细胞生成不需要betacR。我们推测,betacR与非造血细胞表达的EpoR结合构成了一种组织保护受体。支持这一假设的是,从大鼠脑、心脏、肝脏或肾脏制备的膜蛋白在通过Epo或CEpo柱后,EpoR大大富集,但与betacR共价结合形成复合物。此外,抗EpoR抗体从对Epo诱导的组织保护有反应的神经元样P-19细胞制备的膜中共免疫沉淀出betacR。对受Epo保护的脊髓神经元和心肌细胞的免疫细胞化学研究表明,Epo、betacR和EpoR在细胞中共同定位。最后,正如该假设所预测的,在betacR基因敲除小鼠中进行的心肌细胞或脊髓损伤模型中,Epo和CEpo均无活性。这些数据支持了EpoR和betacR构成一种组织保护异源受体的概念。