Kouimtsidis Ch, John-Smith St, Kemp P, Ikkos G
University of Hertfordshire.
Psychiatriki. 2013 Jan-Mar;24(1):45-54.
Health provision systems in the developed western nations are currently facing major financial challenges. In order to meet these challenges, a number of new approaches used to assist the provision of health have been introduced, including the practice of health professionals. These approaches utilize specific methods of data capture and summarization such as: evidence based medicine (EBM) and practice guidelines. Evidence is generated from systematic clinical research as well as reported clinical experience and individually case based empirical evidence. All types of research though (quantitative or qualitative) have limitations. Similarly all types of evidence have advantages and disadvantages and can be complimentary to each other. Evidencebased individual decision (EBID) making is the commonest evidence-based medicine as practiced by the individual clinician in making decisions about the care of the individual patient. It involves integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. However this sort of evidence-based medicine, focuses excessively on the individual (potentially at the expense of others) in a system with limited budgets. Evidence-based guidelines (EBG) also support the practice of evidence-based medicine but at the organizational or institutional level. The main aim is to identify which interventions, over a range of patients, work best and which is cost-effective in order to guide service development and provision at a strategic level. Doing this effectively is a scientific and statistical skill in itself and the quality of guidelines is based primarily on the quality research evidence. It is important to note that lack of systematic evidence to support an intervention does not automatically mean that an intervention must instantly be abandoned. It is also important that guidelines are understood for what they are, i.e. not rules, or complete statements of knowledge. EBM will never have enough suitable evidence for all and every aspects of health provision in every locality. Innovation signifies a substantial positive change compared to gradual or incremental changes. Innovation using inductive reasoning has to play a major role within health care system and it is applicable to all three level of service provision: clinical practice, policy and organisation structure. The aim of this paper is to examine critically the above concepts and their complimentary role in supporting provision of health care systems which are suitable for the requirements of the population, affordable, deliverable, flexible and adaptable to social changes.
西方发达国家的医疗供应体系目前正面临重大财政挑战。为应对这些挑战,已引入了一些用于辅助医疗供应的新方法,包括医疗专业人员的实践。这些方法采用特定的数据采集和汇总方法,如循证医学(EBM)和实践指南。证据来源于系统的临床研究、报告的临床经验以及基于个体病例的实证证据。不过,所有类型的研究(定量或定性)都有局限性。同样,所有类型的证据都有优缺点,且可相互补充。循证个体决策(EBID)是个体临床医生在为个体患者制定护理决策时最常用的循证医学方式。它涉及将个体临床专业知识与系统研究中可得的最佳外部临床证据相结合。然而,在预算有限的系统中,这种循证医学过度关注个体(可能以牺牲他人为代价)。循证指南(EBG)也支持循证医学的实践,但在组织或机构层面。其主要目的是确定在一系列患者中哪些干预措施效果最佳以及哪些具有成本效益,以便在战略层面指导服务的发展和提供。有效地做到这一点本身就是一项科学和统计技能,指南的质量主要基于高质量的研究证据。需要注意的是,缺乏支持某项干预措施的系统证据并不自动意味着必须立即放弃该干预措施。同样重要的是要理解指南的本质,即它们不是规则,也不是完整的知识陈述。循证医学永远不会有足够合适的证据用于每个地区医疗供应的所有方面。与渐进式或增量式变化相比,创新意味着实质性的积极变化。运用归纳推理的创新必须在医疗保健系统中发挥重要作用,并且适用于服务提供的所有三个层面:临床实践、政策和组织结构。本文的目的是批判性地审视上述概念及其在支持适合人群需求、可负担、可提供、灵活且能适应社会变化的医疗保健系统供应方面的互补作用。