*Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Baycrest and Mt Sinai Hospital †Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest §Dalla Lana School of Public Health Departments of #Psychology ‡Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto ∥LC Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute ¶Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre ††Ontario Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada **Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013 Oct-Dec;27(4):316-23. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318293b546.
We studied behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) using object alternation (OA) as a novel probe of cognition. This task was adopted from animal models and is sensitive to ventrolateral-orbitofrontal and medial frontal function in humans. OA was administered to bvFTD patients, normal controls, and a dementia control group with Alzheimer disease (AD). Two other frontal lobe measures adopted from animal models were administered: delayed response (DR) and delayed alternation (DA). Brain volumes were measured using the semiautomatic brain region extraction method. Compared with the normal controls, bvFTD patients were significantly impaired on OA and DR. For OA and DR, sensitivities and specificities were 100% and 51.5% (cutoff=22.5 errors) and 9.5% and 98% (cutoff=1.5 errors), respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) for OA was 100% at all prevalence rates. Comparing AD with bvFTD, there were no significant differences on OA, DR, or DA. Nevertheless, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV were good at all prevalence rates for OA (cutoff=36.5 errors) and DA (cutoff=6 errors); PPV was good for DR (cutoff=9 errors). Error scores above cutoffs favored diagnosis of AD. Performance on OA was significantly related to medial frontal gray matter atrophy. OA, together with DR and DA, may facilitate assessment of bvFTD as a novel probe of medial frontal function.
我们使用物体交替(OA)作为认知的新探针来研究行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)。这项任务是从动物模型中采用的,对人类的腹外侧眶额和内侧前额叶功能敏感。OA 被用于 bvFTD 患者、正常对照组和阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆对照组。还采用了来自动物模型的另外两个额叶测量方法:延迟反应(DR)和延迟交替(DA)。使用半自动脑区提取方法测量脑体积。与正常对照组相比,bvFTD 患者在 OA 和 DR 上明显受损。对于 OA 和 DR,敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 51.5%(截止值=22.5 个错误)和 9.5%和 98%(截止值=1.5 个错误)。OA 的阴性预测值(NPV)在所有流行率下均为 100%。将 AD 与 bvFTD 进行比较,OA、DR 或 DA 之间没有显著差异。然而,OA(截止值=36.5 个错误)和 DA(截止值=6 个错误)的 OA 和 DA 的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)在所有流行率下均良好;DR 的 PPV 良好(截止值=9 个错误)。超过截止值的错误分数有利于 AD 的诊断。OA 的表现与内侧前额叶灰质萎缩显著相关。OA 与 DR 和 DA 一起,可能有助于评估 bvFTD 作为内侧前额叶功能的新探针。