Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Med Care. 2013 Jul;51(7):606-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182928f44.
Interest in comparing hospital surgical quality continues to increase, particularly with respect to examining certain hospital designations such as National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CC). Our objectives were to compare patients, surgical complexity, and risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes following major cancer surgery at NCI-CC versus non-NCI centers.
From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, patients were identified who underwent colorectal, pancreatic, or esophagogastric resection for cancer (2007-2011). Regression methods were used to evaluate characteristics associated with undergoing treatment at NCI-CCs and surgical-complexity-adjusted 30-day morbidity, mortality, and prolonged length-of-stay at NCI-CC versus non-NCI centers.
NCI-CCs performed 20.2% of colorectal (10,555/52,265), 53.5% of pancreatic (6335/11,838), and 49.8% of esophagogastric (1596/3208) operations for cancer. NCI-CCs were more likely to treat patients who were younger, white, and with fewer comorbidities, but were more likely to perform more complex procedures including synchronous liver resection (eg, colorectal), adjacent organ resections (rectal cancer), and vascular reconstructions (eg, pancreas) (all P<0.05). NCI-CCs had a lower mortality rate for colorectal surgery only (1.2% vs. 1.9%) and increased rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) for colorectal (9.8% vs. 7.1%) and pancreatic (10.7% vs. 8.8%) surgery. No differences existed for the remaining complications by NCI-CC designation status. NCI-CCs were distributed throughout hospital quality rankings for all procedures and complications assessed.
NCI-CCs treated younger, healthier patients, but performed more complex procedures. Patients treated at NCI-CCs had a lower risk of mortality for colorectal resection, but morbidity was similar to non-NCI centers. Comparison of cancer surgery hospital quality is feasible and should adjust for differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical complexity.
人们对比较医院外科手术质量的兴趣持续增加,尤其是在检查某些医院指定的情况时,如美国国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心(NCI-CC)。我们的目标是比较在 NCI-CC 和非 NCI 中心接受主要癌症手术的患者、手术复杂性和风险调整后 30 天的结果。
从美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划中,确定了 2007 年至 2011 年间接受癌症的结直肠、胰腺或食管胃切除术的患者。回归方法用于评估与在 NCI-CC 接受治疗以及在 NCI-CC 和非 NCI 中心接受手术复杂性调整后 30 天发病率、死亡率和延长住院时间相关的特征。
NCI-CC 进行了 20.2%的结直肠(10555/52265)、53.5%的胰腺(6335/11838)和 49.8%的食管胃(1596/3208)癌症手术。NCI-CC 更倾向于治疗年龄较小、白人且合并症较少的患者,但更倾向于进行更复杂的手术,包括同步肝切除术(如结直肠)、相邻器官切除术(直肠癌)和血管重建术(如胰腺)(均 P<0.05)。NCI-CC 仅在结直肠手术中死亡率较低(1.2% vs. 1.9%),且结直肠(9.8% vs. 7.1%)和胰腺(10.7% vs. 8.8%)手术的浅表手术部位感染(SSI)发生率增加。根据 NCI-CC 指定状态,其余并发症无差异。NCI-CC 在所有评估的手术和并发症的医院质量排名中分布广泛。
NCI-CC 治疗的患者年龄较小、健康状况较好,但进行了更复杂的手术。在 NCI-CC 接受治疗的患者结直肠切除术的死亡率较低,但发病率与非 NCI 中心相似。对癌症手术医院质量进行比较是可行的,并且应该调整患者人口统计学、合并症和手术复杂性的差异。