• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专门的癌症中心更有可能在肝胰手术后达到教科书般的效果。

Dedicated Cancer Centers are More Likely to Achieve a Textbook Outcome Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(6):1889-1897. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08279-y. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-08279-y
PMID:32108924
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study is to assess rates of textbook outcome (TO) among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery for cancer at dedicated cancer centers (DCCs) and National Cancer Institute affiliated cancer centers (NCI-CCs) versus non-DCC non-NCI hospitals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files were utilized to identify patients undergoing HP surgery between 2013 and 2017. TO was defined as no postoperative surgical complications, no 90-day mortality, no prolonged length of hospital stay, and no 90-day readmission after discharge.

RESULTS

Among 21,234 Medicare patients, 8.2% patients underwent surgery at DCCs whereas 32.1% underwent surgery at NCI-CCs and 59.7% underwent an operation at neither DCCs nor NCI-CCs. Although DCCs more often cared for patients with severe comorbidities [Charlson score > 5: DCCs, 1195 (68.9%), NCI-CCs, 3687 (54.1%), others, 3970 (31.3%); p < 0.001], DCCs achieved higher rates of TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. Interestingly, DCCs were more likely to perform surgery with a minimally invasive approach versus NCI-CCs and other US hospitals (17.0%, n = 295, vs. 12.6%, n = 856 vs. 11.9%, n = 1504, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing liver surgery at DCCs had 31% and 36% higher odds of achieving TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals, respectively. Medicare expenditure was substantially lower for patients achieving TO at DCCs compared with patients who achieved a TO at NCI-CCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though DCCs more frequently took care of patients with high comorbidity burden, the likelihood of achieving TO for HP surgery at DCCs was higher compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. The data suggest that DCCs provide higher-value surgical care for patients with HP malignancies.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在评估在专门癌症中心(DCC)和美国国立癌症研究所附属癌症中心(NCI-CC)接受肝癌胰腺(HP)手术的医疗保险受益人的教科书结局(TO)率,与非 DCC 非 NCI 医院相比。

患者和方法

利用医疗保险住院标准分析文件,确定 2013 年至 2017 年间接受 HP 手术的患者。TO 定义为无术后手术并发症、90 天内无死亡、无延长住院时间和出院后 90 天内无再入院。

结果

在 21234 名医疗保险患者中,8.2%的患者在 DCC 接受手术,32.1%的患者在 NCI-CC 接受手术,59.7%的患者在 DCC 和 NCI-CC 均未接受手术。尽管 DCC 更常照顾患有严重合并症的患者[Charlson 评分>5:DCC,1195(68.9%),NCI-CC,3687(54.1%),其他,3970(31.3%);p<0.001],但与 NCI-CC 和其他美国医院相比,DCC 达到 TO 的比例更高。有趣的是,与 NCI-CC 和其他美国医院相比,DCC 更倾向于采用微创方法进行手术(17.0%,n=295,vs.12.6%,n=856 vs.11.9%,n=1504,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,与 NCI-CC 和其他美国医院相比,在 DCC 接受肝切除术的患者达到 TO 的几率分别高 31%和 36%。与在 NCI-CC 达到 TO 的患者相比,在 DCC 达到 TO 的患者的医疗保险支出明显更低。

结论

尽管 DCC 更频繁地照顾患有高合并症负担的患者,但与 NCI-CC 和其他美国医院相比,DCC 进行 HP 手术的 TO 几率更高。数据表明,DCC 为 HP 恶性肿瘤患者提供了更高价值的手术护理。

相似文献

1
Dedicated Cancer Centers are More Likely to Achieve a Textbook Outcome Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.专门的癌症中心更有可能在肝胰手术后达到教科书般的效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(6):1889-1897. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08279-y. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
The Impact of Dedicated Cancer Centers on Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Liver and Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.专门的癌症中心对 Medicare 受益人的肝和胰腺癌手术结局的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):4083-4090. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07677-1. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
What Is the Value of Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases at Dedicated Cancer Centers?在癌症专科医院接受脊柱转移手术的价值是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jun 1;479(6):1311-1319. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001640.
4
Assessment of Magnet status and Textbook Outcomes among medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepato-pancreatic surgery for cancer.评估医疗保险受益人为癌症行胰脏肝脏切除术之磁铁地位与教科书结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(3):334-342. doi: 10.1002/jso.26521. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Trends in perioperative outcomes of hospitals performing major cancer surgery.医院施行重大癌症手术的围手术期结局趋势。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;118(4):694-703. doi: 10.1002/jso.25171. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
6
Differences in patients, surgical complexity, and outcomes after cancer surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers compared to other hospitals.癌症手术患者、手术复杂性和结果的差异:美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心与其他医院的比较。
Med Care. 2013 Jul;51(7):606-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182928f44.
7
Comparison of Hospitals Affiliated With PPS-Exempt Cancer Centers, Other Hospitals Affiliated With NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, and Other Hospitals That Provide Cancer Care.与PPS豁免癌症中心相关的医院、其他与美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心相关的医院以及其他提供癌症护理的医院的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Aug 1;179(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0914.
8
Association of social vulnerability with the use of high-volume and Magnet recognition hospitals for hepatopancreatic cancer surgery.社会脆弱性与肝胰癌症手术中使用大容量和磁铁识别医院的关联。
Surgery. 2021 Aug;170(2):571-578. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
The association of neighborhood social vulnerability with surgical textbook outcomes among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery.社区社会脆弱性与接受肝胆胰手术患者手术教科书结局的关联。
Surgery. 2020 Nov;168(5):868-875. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Influence of hospital teaching status on the chance to achieve a textbook outcome after hepatopancreatic surgery for cancer among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群行肝胰切除术治疗癌症后达到教科书结局的机会受医院教学地位的影响。
Surgery. 2020 Jul;168(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.02.024. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in Outcomes of Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates Performing Hepatopancreatic Surgery in the United States Based on Fellowship Training Program.基于专科培训项目,美国外科肿瘤学专科毕业生进行肝胰手术的结果差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17587-0.
2
Telemedicine Trends in Ambulatory Surgical Oncology: A Five-Year Analysis of Visit Volume and Utilization at a High-Volume Academic Center.门诊手术肿瘤学中的远程医疗趋势:对一家高流量学术中心就诊量和使用情况的五年分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17592-3.
3
Realizing Textbook Outcomes Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Neoplasms with Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis.美国胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者评估淋巴结数量的趋势:多机构和国家数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08120-1. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
2
How Safe Are Safety-Net Hospitals? Opportunities to Improve Outcomes for Vulnerable Patients Undergoing Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery.安全网医院有多安全?改善接受肝胆胰手术的弱势患者结局的机会。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Nov;24(11):2570-2578. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04428-1. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
实现肝肿瘤切除术后的教科书式结果:预测列线图的建立与验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):7870-7881. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15983-6. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Association of textbook outcomes with improved survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.胰十二指肠切除术后胰腺导管腺癌患者教科书式预后与生存改善的相关性:一项回顾性研究
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jul 11;9:38. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-112. eCollection 2024.
5
Practice Patterns and Outcomes Among Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates Performing Complex Cancer Surgery in the United States Across Different Career Stages.美国不同职业阶段的外科肿瘤学研究员在进行复杂癌症手术方面的实践模式和结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):4873-4881. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15436-0. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
Textbook outcomes in the liver-first approach for colorectal liver metastases: prospective multicentre analysis.肝优先策略治疗结直肠癌肝转移的教科书结局:前瞻性多中心分析。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123.
7
Variation in Hospital Mortality After Complex Cancer Surgery: Patient, Volume, Hospital or Social Determinants?复杂癌症手术后的医院死亡率差异:患者、容量、医院或社会决定因素?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):2856-2866. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14852-y. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
8
Variations in Travel Patterns Affect Regionalization of Complex Cancer Surgery in California.旅行模式的变化影响加利福尼亚州复杂癌症手术的区域化。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8044-8053. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14242-4. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
9
Measuring success in hepatectomy.衡量肝切除术的成功与否。
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1652-1655. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-725. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
10
Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review.教科书式肝外科手术结局:系统综述。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1277-1289. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05673-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Using Center-Specific Medicare Data to Compare Cancer Care Outcomes: Are We Seeing the Whole Playing Field or Just a Blade of Grass.
利用特定中心的医疗保险数据比较癌症治疗结果:我们看到的是整个赛场还是仅仅一片草叶?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3809-3810. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07720-1. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Textbook Outcomes Among Medicare Patients Undergoing Hepatopancreatic Surgery.医保患者接受肝胰手术的教科书式结局。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1116-1123. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003105.
5
30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?肺癌全身抗癌治疗开始后的30天死亡率:它真的是一个有用的性能指标吗?
ERJ Open Res. 2018 Nov 5;4(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00030-2018. eCollection 2018 Oct.
6
Perspectives of quality care in cancer treatment: a review of the literature.癌症治疗中的优质护理视角:文献综述
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Jul;6(6):321-9.