Brigham and Women's-Faulkner Hospital Academic Hospitalist Service, Boston, MA, USA.
Med Care. 2013 Jul;51(7):567-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182902151.
Proposed changes to financing of teaching hospitals and new quality-based performance incentives may differentially impact the financial health of teaching and safety-net institutions. Few data have examined the potential impact of these financial changes on teaching institutions.
To determine the association of hospital teaching intensity with processes and outcomes of care for the most common inpatient diagnoses in the United States.
Cross-sectional analysis of the 2008 Hospital Quality Alliance and 2007 American Hospital Association databases, adjusted for hospital characteristics.
A total of 2418 hospitals distributed across the country with available data on teaching intensity (resident-to-bed ratio), quality-of-care process measures, and risk-adjusted readmission and mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and pneumonia.
Hospital-level quality-of-care process indicators and 30-day risk-adjusted readmission and mortality rates for AMI, CHF, and pneumonia.
Multivariable analysis demonstrates that all hospitals perform uniformly well on quality-of-care process measures for AMI, CHF, and pneumonia. However, when compared with nonteaching hospitals, increasing hospital teaching intensity is significantly associated with improved risk-adjusted mortality for AMI and CHF, but higher risk-adjusted readmission rates for all 3 conditions. Among high teaching intensity hospitals, those with larger Medicaid populations (safety-net institutions) had particularly high readmission rates for AMI and CHF.
In this nationally representative evaluation, we found significant variation in performance on risk-adjusted mortality and readmission rates, and differences in readmission rates based on safety-net status. Our findings suggest that high teaching intensity and safety-net institutions may be disproportionately affected by upcoming changes in hospital payment models.
教学医院融资方式的改变和新的基于质量的绩效激励措施可能会对教学医院和提供医疗保障的机构的财务状况产生不同的影响。很少有数据研究这些财政变化对教学机构的潜在影响。
确定医院教学强度与美国最常见住院诊断的护理过程和结果之间的关系。
对 2008 年医院质量联盟和 2007 年美国医院协会数据库进行横断面分析,调整了医院特征。
共有 2418 家分布在全国各地的医院,这些医院提供了教学强度(住院医师与床位比)、质量护理过程指标以及急性心肌梗死(AMI)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和肺炎的 30 天风险调整再入院率和死亡率的相关数据。
医院层面的质量护理过程指标以及 AMI、CHF 和肺炎的 30 天风险调整再入院率和死亡率。
多变量分析表明,所有医院在 AMI、CHF 和肺炎的质量护理过程指标上表现一致良好。然而,与非教学医院相比,随着医院教学强度的增加,AMI 和 CHF 的风险调整死亡率显著降低,但所有 3 种情况下的风险调整再入院率均升高。在高教学强度医院中,那些 Medicaid 患者较多的医院(提供医疗保障的机构)的 AMI 和 CHF 再入院率尤其高。
在这项具有全国代表性的评估中,我们发现风险调整死亡率和再入院率的表现存在显著差异,并且基于安全网状况的再入院率也存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,高强度教学和安全网机构可能会受到即将到来的医院支付模式改变的不成比例的影响。