• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determinants of physician networks: an ethnographic study examining the processes that inform patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making among physicians.医生网络的决定因素:一项人种志研究,考察影响医生之间合作模式和转诊决策过程的因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e042334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334.
2
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
3
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
4
The decision-making processes of nurses when extubating patients following cardiac surgery: an ethnographic study.心脏手术后护士为患者拔管时的决策过程:一项人种志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43(6):693-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
5
Interprofessional Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Non-Physician Perspectives on Resident Competency.跨专业协作:非医师视角下对住院医师能力的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4238-0. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study.老年前列腺癌患者术前评估决策机制的定性研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):561-569. doi: 10.1002/jso.25819. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Exploring successful community pharmacist-physician collaborative working relationships using mixed methods.采用混合方法探索成功的社区药剂师-医师合作关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Dec;6(4):307-23. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
9
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Implementation Strategies to Support the Uptake of a Risk Tool to Aid Physicians in the Clinical Management of Patients With Syncope: Systematic Theoretical and User-Centered Design Approach.制定实施策略以支持采用风险工具,协助医生对晕厥患者进行临床管理:系统的理论和以用户为中心的设计方法
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 13;10:e44089. doi: 10.2196/44089.
2
An integrative perspective on interorganizational multilevel healthcare networks: a systematic literature review.组织间多层次医疗保健网络的综合视角:系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08314-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting US News & World Report's Hospital Rankings-Moving Beyond Mortality to Metrics that Improve Care.重新审视《美国新闻与世界报道》的医院排名——从死亡率指标转向能改善医疗服务的指标。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):209-210. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06002-x. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Dispositional Humility Of Clinicians In An Interprofessional Primary Care Environment: A Mixed Methods Study.跨专业初级保健环境中临床医生的性格谦逊:一项混合方法研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Nov 19;12:925-934. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S226631. eCollection 2019.
3
Redefining the "Honor Roll:" do hospital rankings predict surgical outcomes or receipt of quality surgical care?重新定义“荣誉榜”:医院排名能预测手术结果或获得高质量外科护理吗?
Am J Surg. 2020 Aug;220(2):438-440. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Concept map of dispositional humility among professionals in an interdisciplinary healthcare environment: qualitative synthesis.跨学科医疗环境中专业人员的性格谦逊概念图:定性综合分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jul 17;12:543-554. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S206526. eCollection 2019.
5
Differential Safety Between Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates for Complex Cancer Surgery.顶级癌症医院与其附属医院在复杂癌症手术中的安全性差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1912.
6
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
7
A categorisation of problems and solutions to improve patient referrals from primary to specialty care.改善患者从基层医疗转诊至专科医疗的问题与解决方案分类。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3745-y.
8
Consumers' Association of Hospital Reputation With Healthcare Quality.消费者对医院声誉与医疗质量的关联看法。
J Healthc Qual. 2019 Jul/Aug;41(4):251-258. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000167.
9
A scoping review of patient-sharing network studies using administrative data.利用行政数据进行患者共享网络研究的范围综述。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jul 17;8(4):598-625. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx015.
10
Is patient loyalty associated with quality of care? Results of a patient survey over primary care in Switzerland.患者忠诚度与医疗质量相关吗?瑞士初级医疗患者调查结果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Apr 1;31(3):199-204. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy142.

医生网络的决定因素:一项人种志研究,考察影响医生之间合作模式和转诊决策过程的因素。

Determinants of physician networks: an ethnographic study examining the processes that inform patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making among physicians.

作者信息

Kierkegaard Patrick, Owen-Smith Jason

机构信息

NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

CRUK Convergence Science Centre, Institute of Cancer Research & Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e042334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334
PMID:33402408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786804/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most scholarly attention to studying collaborative ties in physician networks has been devoted to quantitatively analysing large, complex datasets. While valuable, such studies can reduce the dynamic and contextual complexities of physician collaborations to numerical values. Qualitative research strategies can contribute to our understanding by addressing the gaps left by more quantitative approaches. This study seeks to contribute to the literature that applies network science approaches to the context of healthcare delivery. We use qualitative, observational and interview, methods to pursue an in-depth, micro-level approach to the deeply social and discursive processes that influence patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making in physician networks.

DESIGN

Qualitative methodologies that paired ethnographic field observations, semistructured interviews and document analysis were used. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse, identify and describe patterns in those data.

SETTING

This study took place in a high-volume cardiovascular department at a major academic medical centre (AMC) located in the Midwest region of the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive and snowballing sampling were used to recruit study participants for both the observational and face-to-face in-depth interview portions of the study. In total, 25 clinicians and 43 patients participated in this study.

RESULTS

Two primary thematic categories were identified: (1) circumstances for external engagement; and (2) clinical conditions for engagement. Thematic subcategories included community engagement, scientific engagement, reputational value, experiential information, professional identity, self-awareness of competence, multidisciplinary programmes and situational factors.

CONCLUSION

This study adds new contextual knowledge about the mechanisms that characterise referral decision-making processes and how these impact the meaning of physician relationships, organisation of healthcare delivery and the knowledge and beliefs that physicians have about their colleagues. This study highlights the nuances that influence how new collaborative networks are formed and maintained by detailing how relationships among physicians develop and evolve over time.

摘要

目的

大多数学术界对医生网络中合作关系的研究都致力于对大型复杂数据集进行定量分析。虽然这类研究很有价值,但可能会将医生合作的动态和背景复杂性简化为数值。定性研究策略可以通过弥补更多定量方法留下的空白,来帮助我们加深理解。本研究旨在为将网络科学方法应用于医疗服务背景的文献做出贡献。我们采用定性、观察和访谈方法,对影响医生网络中合作模式和转诊决策的深层次社会和话语过程进行深入的微观层面研究。

设计

采用了将人种志实地观察、半结构化访谈和文献分析相结合的定性方法。运用归纳主题分析方法对这些数据中的模式进行分析、识别和描述。

背景

本研究在美国中西部地区一家大型学术医疗中心(AMC)的一个高流量心血管科进行。

参与者

采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,为研究的观察部分和面对面深度访谈部分招募研究参与者。共有25名临床医生和43名患者参与了本研究。

结果

确定了两个主要主题类别:(1)外部参与的情况;(2)参与的临床条件。主题子类别包括社区参与、科学参与、声誉价值、经验信息、职业认同、能力自我认知、多学科项目和情境因素。

结论

本研究增加了关于转诊决策过程特征机制的新背景知识,以及这些机制如何影响医生关系的意义、医疗服务的组织,以及医生对同事的知识和信念。本研究通过详细阐述医生之间的关系如何随着时间的推移而发展和演变,突出了影响新合作网络形成和维持方式的细微差别。