Kierkegaard Patrick, Owen-Smith Jason
NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
CRUK Convergence Science Centre, Institute of Cancer Research & Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e042334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334.
Most scholarly attention to studying collaborative ties in physician networks has been devoted to quantitatively analysing large, complex datasets. While valuable, such studies can reduce the dynamic and contextual complexities of physician collaborations to numerical values. Qualitative research strategies can contribute to our understanding by addressing the gaps left by more quantitative approaches. This study seeks to contribute to the literature that applies network science approaches to the context of healthcare delivery. We use qualitative, observational and interview, methods to pursue an in-depth, micro-level approach to the deeply social and discursive processes that influence patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making in physician networks.
Qualitative methodologies that paired ethnographic field observations, semistructured interviews and document analysis were used. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse, identify and describe patterns in those data.
This study took place in a high-volume cardiovascular department at a major academic medical centre (AMC) located in the Midwest region of the USA.
Purposive and snowballing sampling were used to recruit study participants for both the observational and face-to-face in-depth interview portions of the study. In total, 25 clinicians and 43 patients participated in this study.
Two primary thematic categories were identified: (1) circumstances for external engagement; and (2) clinical conditions for engagement. Thematic subcategories included community engagement, scientific engagement, reputational value, experiential information, professional identity, self-awareness of competence, multidisciplinary programmes and situational factors.
This study adds new contextual knowledge about the mechanisms that characterise referral decision-making processes and how these impact the meaning of physician relationships, organisation of healthcare delivery and the knowledge and beliefs that physicians have about their colleagues. This study highlights the nuances that influence how new collaborative networks are formed and maintained by detailing how relationships among physicians develop and evolve over time.
大多数学术界对医生网络中合作关系的研究都致力于对大型复杂数据集进行定量分析。虽然这类研究很有价值,但可能会将医生合作的动态和背景复杂性简化为数值。定性研究策略可以通过弥补更多定量方法留下的空白,来帮助我们加深理解。本研究旨在为将网络科学方法应用于医疗服务背景的文献做出贡献。我们采用定性、观察和访谈方法,对影响医生网络中合作模式和转诊决策的深层次社会和话语过程进行深入的微观层面研究。
采用了将人种志实地观察、半结构化访谈和文献分析相结合的定性方法。运用归纳主题分析方法对这些数据中的模式进行分析、识别和描述。
本研究在美国中西部地区一家大型学术医疗中心(AMC)的一个高流量心血管科进行。
采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,为研究的观察部分和面对面深度访谈部分招募研究参与者。共有25名临床医生和43名患者参与了本研究。
确定了两个主要主题类别:(1)外部参与的情况;(2)参与的临床条件。主题子类别包括社区参与、科学参与、声誉价值、经验信息、职业认同、能力自我认知、多学科项目和情境因素。
本研究增加了关于转诊决策过程特征机制的新背景知识,以及这些机制如何影响医生关系的意义、医疗服务的组织,以及医生对同事的知识和信念。本研究通过详细阐述医生之间的关系如何随着时间的推移而发展和演变,突出了影响新合作网络形成和维持方式的细微差别。