*Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA †Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH ‡Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Med Care. 2014 Jan;52(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000005.
Under the Affordable Care Act, health care reimbursement will increasingly be linked to quality and costs. In this environment, teaching hospitals will be closely scrutinized, as their care is often more expensive. Furthermore, although they serve vital roles in education, research, management of complex diseases, and care of vulnerable populations, debate continues as to whether teaching hospitals deliver better outcomes for common conditions.
To determine the association between risk-standardized mortality and teaching intensity for 3 common conditions.
Using CMS models, 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates were compared among US hospitals classified as Council of Teaching Hospital (COTH) members, non-COTH teaching hospitals, or nonteaching hospitals. These analyses were repeated using ratios of interns and residents to beds to classify teaching intensity.
The study cohort included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years or older hospitalized in acute care hospitals during 2009-2010 for acute myocardial infarction (N = 342,145), heart failure (N = 647,081), or pneumonia (N = 598,366).
The 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates for each condition, stratified by teaching intensity.
For each diagnosis, compared with nonteaching hospitals there was a 10% relative reduction in the adjusted odds of mortality for patients admitted to COTH hospitals and a 6%-7% relative reduction for patients admitted to non-COTH teaching hospitals. These findings were insensitive to the method of classifying teaching intensity and only partially explained by higher teaching hospital volumes.
Health care reimbursement strategies designed to increase value should consider not only the costs but also the superior clinical outcomes at teaching hospitals for certain common conditions.
根据《平价医疗法案》,医疗保健报销将越来越与质量和成本挂钩。在这种环境下,教学医院将受到密切审查,因为它们的护理费用通常更高。此外,尽管教学医院在教育、研究、复杂疾病管理和弱势群体护理方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但关于它们是否能为常见疾病提供更好的治疗效果,仍存在争议。
确定 3 种常见疾病的风险标准化死亡率与教学强度之间的关联。
使用 CMS 模型,比较被归类为教学医院理事会(COTH)成员、非 COTH 教学医院或非教学医院的美国医院之间的 30 天风险标准化死亡率。使用住院医师和实习医生与病床的比例来分类教学强度,重复这些分析。
研究队列包括 2009 年至 2010 年期间在急性护理医院住院的年龄在 66 岁或以上的 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的急性心肌梗死(N=342145)、心力衰竭(N=647081)或肺炎(N=598366)患者。
每种疾病的 30 天风险标准化死亡率,按教学强度分层。
对于每种诊断,与非教学医院相比,COTH 医院收治的患者的死亡率调整后比值比降低了 10%,非 COTH 教学医院收治的患者的死亡率调整后比值比降低了 6%-7%。这些发现对教学强度的分类方法不敏感,并且仅部分由教学医院的较高容量解释。
旨在提高价值的医疗保健报销策略不仅应考虑成本,还应考虑某些常见疾病在教学医院的卓越临床结果。