Suppr超能文献

皮质类固醇在重症监护病房中的应用:对重症监护医师的调查。

Corticosteroid use in the intensive care unit: a survey of intensivists.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):652-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9929-3. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in many critical illnesses remains uncertain. Our primary objective was to survey intensivists in North America about their perceived use of corticosteroids in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Self-administered paper survey.

POPULATION

Intensivists in academic hospitals with clinical trial expertise in critical illness.

MEASUREMENTS

We generated questionnaire items in focus groups and refined them after assessments of clinical sensibility and test-retest reliability and pilot testing. We administered the survey to experienced intensivists practicing in selected North American centres actively enrolling patients in the multicentre Oscillation for ARDS Treated Early (OSCILLATE) Trial (ISRCTN87124254). Respondents used a four-point scale to grade how frequently they would administer corticosteroids in 14 clinical settings. They also reported their opinions on 16 potential near-absolute indications or contraindications for the use of corticosteroids.

MAIN RESULTS

Our response rate was 82% (103/125). Respondents were general internists (50%), respirologists (22%), anesthesiologists (21%), and surgeons (7%) who practiced in mixed medical-surgical units. A majority of respondents reported almost always prescribing corticosteroids in the setting of significant bronchospasm in a mechanically ventilated patient (94%), recent corticosteroid use and low blood pressure (93%), and vasopressor-refractory septic shock (52%). Although more than half of respondents stated they would almost never prescribe corticosteroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia (81%), acute lung injury (ALI, 76%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 65%), and severe ARDS (51%), variability increased with severity of acute lung injury. Near-absolute indications selected by most respondents included known adrenal insufficiency (99%) and suspicion of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (89%), connective tissue disease (85%), or other potentially corticosteroid-responsive illnesses (85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents reported rarely prescribing corticosteroids for ALI, but accepted them for bronchospasm, suspected adrenal insufficiency due to previous corticosteroid use, and vasopressor-refractory septic shock. These competing indications will complicate the design and interpretation of any future large-scale trial of corticosteroids in critical illness.

摘要

目的

全身性皮质类固醇在许多危重病中的疗效仍不确定。我们的主要目的是调查北美的重症监护医生,了解他们在临床实践中对皮质类固醇的使用情况。

设计

自我管理的纸质调查。

人群

具有危重病临床试验专业知识的学术医院的重症监护医生。

测量

我们在焦点小组中生成问卷项目,并在评估临床敏感性和测试-重测可靠性以及试点测试后对其进行了改进。我们向在选定的北美中心进行实践的经验丰富的重症监护医生进行了调查,这些中心正在积极招募参与多中心振荡治疗 ARDS 试验(OSCILLATE)的患者(ISRCTN87124254)。受访者使用四点量表对他们在 14 种临床情况下使用皮质类固醇的频率进行评分。他们还对皮质类固醇使用的 16 种潜在绝对适应证或禁忌证发表了意见。

主要结果

我们的回复率为 82%(103/125)。受访者是普通内科医生(50%)、呼吸科医生(22%)、麻醉师(21%)和外科医生(7%),他们在混合内科-外科病房工作。大多数受访者报告说,在机械通气患者出现明显支气管痉挛(94%)、近期使用皮质类固醇和低血压(93%)以及升压药难治性感染性休克(52%)的情况下,他们几乎总是开皮质类固醇处方。尽管超过一半的受访者表示,他们几乎不会在严重社区获得性肺炎(81%)、急性肺损伤(ALI,76%)、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS,65%)和严重 ARDS(51%)中开皮质类固醇处方,但随着急性肺损伤的严重程度的增加,这种情况的可变性增加。大多数受访者选择的绝对适应证包括已知的肾上腺功能不全(99%)和疑似隐源性机化性肺炎(89%)、结缔组织疾病(85%)或其他潜在可接受皮质类固醇治疗的疾病(85%)。

结论

受访者报告说,很少开皮质类固醇治疗 ALI,但在支气管痉挛、因先前使用皮质类固醇而怀疑肾上腺功能不全、升压药难治性感染性休克的情况下,他们会开皮质类固醇。这些相互竞争的适应证将使皮质类固醇在危重病中的任何未来大规模试验的设计和解释复杂化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验