Knight Marisa, Mather Mara
Department of Psychology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94117, USA.
Exp Aging Res. 2013;39(3):305-21. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.779197.
BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Older adults' peak performance on memory and cognitive inhibition tasks tends to be in the morning, whereas younger adults' peak performance tends to be in the afternoon. Although these tasks require efficient attentional processes for optimal performance, previous research examining age differences in the effects of time of day has not measured the distinct aspects of attention quantified by the Attention Network Test (ANT; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz, & Posner, 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347).
The authors examined the relationship between time of testing and the efficiency of alerting, orienting, and executive attention networks by randomly assigning younger (18-28 years; n = 27, M = 21.37 years, SD = 2.39) and older (65-85 years; n = 32, M = 73.34 years, SD = 5.18) adults to morning (AM) or afternoon (PM) testing of alerting, orienting, and executive attention. Mean reaction times for each network were analyzed with a univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with age (younger, older) and time of day (AM, PM) as between-subjects factors.
Consistent with the authors' hypotheses, although time of day had little effect on orienting or executive attention, it affected alerting in opposite ways for younger and older adults, with alerting cues benefiting performance most at participants' off-peak times of day. A larger benefit from alerting cues was observed when participants were tested at their off-peak (M = 30.11 ± 15.66) relative to their peak (M = 2.18 ± 15.97) time.
These findings show that age-related circadian patterns influence the alerting component of attention, with both age groups showing the largest benefit from alerting cues when testing occurs at nonoptimal times of day. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of controlling for time of day in investigations of attention and add to our understanding of how age differences in circadian patterns impact attention.
背景/研究背景:老年人在记忆和认知抑制任务上的最佳表现往往出现在上午,而年轻人的最佳表现往往出现在下午。尽管这些任务需要高效的注意力过程才能达到最佳表现,但之前研究一天中不同时间对年龄差异影响的研究并未测量注意力网络测试(ANT;Fan、McCandliss、Sommer、Raz和Posner,2002年,《认知神经科学杂志》,14卷,340 - 347页)所量化的注意力的不同方面。
作者通过将年轻人(18 - 28岁;n = 27,M = 21.37岁,SD = 2.39)和老年人(65 - 85岁;n = 32,M = 73.34岁,SD = 5.18)随机分配到上午(AM)或下午(PM)进行警觉、定向和执行注意力测试,研究了测试时间与警觉、定向和执行注意力网络效率之间的关系。使用以年龄(年轻人、老年人)和一天中的时间(上午、下午)作为组间因素的单因素方差分析(ANOVA)来分析每个网络的平均反应时间。
与作者的假设一致,尽管一天中的时间对定向或执行注意力影响不大,但它对年轻人和老年人的警觉产生了相反的影响,警觉线索在参与者一天中的非峰值时间对表现的益处最大。当参与者在非峰值(M = 30.11 ± 15.66)相对于峰值(M = 2.18 ± 15.97)时间进行测试时,观察到警觉线索带来的益处更大。
这些发现表明,与年龄相关的昼夜节律模式会影响注意力的警觉成分,两个年龄组在一天中非最佳时间进行测试时,都从警觉线索中获得了最大益处。总体而言,这些发现强调了在注意力研究中控制一天中时间的重要性,并增进了我们对昼夜节律模式中的年龄差异如何影响注意力的理解。