European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Rue de l'autonomie 4, Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2013 Apr 22;2(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-2-17.
In Europe, successful health policies have contributed to a continued decline in mortality. However, not all parts of Europe have benefited equally and the sustainability of achievements cannot be taken for granted since health policies vary widely even among neighbouring countries. Furthermore, there are a number of remaining public health challenges such as food and alcohol polices. We argue that if we are to make further progress we need to rethink the politics and implementation of Health in All Policies. Commenting on an article analyzing the roll out and early implementation of Israel's National Programme to Promote Active, Healthy Lifestyles provides an opportunity to thrash out four issues. First, intersectoral structures are key transmission belts for Health in All Policies between ministries and sectors and we need to exploit their specific uses and understand their limitations. Second, our analytical perspective should focus on what it takes to introduce policy change instead of assuming an idealized policy cycle. This includes a reconsideration of interventions which may not be very effective but help to raise the standing of health on the political agenda, thus providing a stronger basis for policy change. Third, we need to better understand variations in context between and within countries, e.g. why do some countries adopt Health in All policies but others don't, and why is it that in the same country compliance with some health policies is better than with others. Finally, we will need to better understand how a diverse set of actors from other sectors can internalize health as an intrinsic value.
在欧洲,成功的卫生政策促使死亡率持续下降。然而,并非欧洲所有地区都同样受益,并且由于卫生政策在邻国之间也存在很大差异,因此成就的可持续性不能视为理所当然。此外,还存在一些其他的公共卫生挑战,如食品和酒类政策。我们认为,如果要取得进一步进展,就需要重新思考“卫生政策融入所有政策”的政治和实施。评论分析以色列国家促进积极健康生活方式计划的推出和早期实施的文章,为讨论四个问题提供了机会。首先,部门间结构是卫生政策在部委和部门之间传播的关键渠道,我们需要利用其特定用途,并了解其局限性。其次,我们的分析视角应侧重于引入政策变革所需的条件,而不是假设理想化的政策周期。这包括重新考虑那些可能效果不太明显,但有助于提高健康在政治议程上地位的干预措施,从而为政策变革提供更强有力的基础。第三,我们需要更好地理解国家之间和国家内部的背景差异,例如为什么有些国家采取“卫生政策融入所有政策”,而有些国家没有,以及为什么在同一个国家,一些卫生政策的执行情况要好于其他政策。最后,我们需要更好地理解来自其他部门的多样化行为者如何将健康作为内在价值内化。