Suppr超能文献

单相和双相抑郁的区别:认知理论视角。

The distinction between unipolar and bipolar depression: a cognitive theory perspective.

机构信息

Psychiatry Clinic, Mersin State Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(7):740-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is very limited data about the cognitive structure of bipolar depression when compared to unipolar depression. The aim of the study was to look into the differences between unipolar and bipolar depressed patients regarding their cognitive structure in view of Beck's cognitive theory.

METHODS

In this study, 70 bipolar patients during a depressive episode, 189 unipolar depressed patients and 120 healthy subjects were recruited. The participants were interviewed by using a structured clinical diagnostic scale. To evaluate the cognitive structure differences, the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) and the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) were used.

RESULTS

We found that on the mean ATQ total score, the unipolar depressed patients scored significantly higher (92.9±22.7) than both the bipolar depressed patients (73.2±24.7) and the healthy subjects (47.1±19.6), even after controlling for all confounding factors, e.g. gender, marital status, depressive symptom severity (F = 157.872, p<0.001). The bipolar depressed patients also scored significantly higher on the mean ATQ total score than the healthy controls. On the mean DAS total score, and on the mean score of its subscale of need for approval, the bipolar depressed patients scored (152.8±21.2 and 48.2±7.4, respectively) significantly higher than both the unipolar depressed patients (160.9±29.0 and 51.9±9.7, respectively) and the healthy subjects (127.9±32.8 and 40.2±12.2, respectively), even after controlling for any confounding factor (F=45.803 [p<0.001] and F=43.206 [p<0.001], respectively). On the mean score of the perfectionistic attitude subscale of the DAS, the depressed groups scored significantly higher than the healthy subjects, but they did not seem to separate from each other (F=41.599, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results may help enhance the understanding of the potentially unique psychotherapeutic targets and the underlying cognitive theory of bipolar depression.

摘要

背景

与单相抑郁相比,双相抑郁的认知结构数据非常有限。本研究旨在根据贝克的认知理论,研究单相和双相抑郁患者在认知结构方面的差异。

方法

本研究纳入了 70 例处于抑郁发作期的双相患者、189 例单相抑郁患者和 120 例健康对照者。采用结构化临床诊断量表对参与者进行访谈。为了评估认知结构差异,使用自动思维问卷(ATQ)和功能失调态度量表(DAS)进行评估。

结果

我们发现,在 ATQ 总分均值上,单相抑郁患者的得分(92.9±22.7)显著高于双相抑郁患者(73.2±24.7)和健康对照者(47.1±19.6),即使在控制了所有混杂因素(如性别、婚姻状况、抑郁症状严重程度等)后也是如此(F=157.872,p<0.001)。双相抑郁患者的 ATQ 总分均值也显著高于健康对照组。在 DAS 总分均值和需要认可的态度子量表的均值上,双相抑郁患者的得分(152.8±21.2 和 48.2±7.4)显著高于单相抑郁患者(160.9±29.0 和 51.9±9.7)和健康对照者(127.9±32.8 和 40.2±12.2),即使在控制了任何混杂因素后也是如此(F=45.803 [p<0.001] 和 F=43.206 [p<0.001])。在 DAS 的完美主义态度子量表的均值上,抑郁组的得分显著高于健康对照组,但两组之间似乎没有明显差异(F=41.599,p<0.001)。

结论

这些结果可能有助于加深对双相抑郁潜在独特心理治疗靶点和潜在认知理论的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验