Redlich Ronny, Almeida Jorge J R, Grotegerd Dominik, Opel Nils, Kugel Harald, Heindel Walter, Arolt Volker, Phillips Mary L, Dannlowski Udo
Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;71(11):1222-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1100.
The structural abnormalities in the brain that accurately differentiate unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar depression (BD) remain unidentified.
First, to investigate and compare morphometric changes in UD and BD, and to replicate the findings at 2 independent neuroimaging sites; second, to differentiate UD and BD using multivariate pattern classification techniques.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a 2-center cross-sectional study, structural gray matter data were obtained at 2 independent sites (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Münster, Germany) using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel-based morphometry was used to compare local gray and white matter volumes, and a novel pattern classification approach was used to discriminate between UD and BD, while training the classifier at one imaging site and testing in an independent sample at the other site. The Pittsburgh sample of participants was recruited from the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic at the University of Pittsburgh from 2008 to 2012. The Münster sample was recruited from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Münster from 2010 to 2012. Equally divided between the 2 sites were 58 currently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder, 58 age- and sex-matched unipolar depressed patients, and 58 matched healthy controls.
Magnetic resonance imaging was used to detect structural differences between groups. Morphometric analyses were applied using voxel-based morphometry. Pattern classification techniques were used for a multivariate approach.
At both sites, individuals with BD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the hippocampal formation and the amygdala relative to individuals with UD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -22, y = -1, z = 20; k = 1938 voxels; t = 4.75), whereas individuals with UD showed reduced gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate gyrus compared with individuals with BD (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x = -8, y = 32, z = 3; k = 979 voxels; t = 6.37; all corrected P < .05). Reductions in white matter volume within the cerebellum and hippocampus were found in individuals with BD. Pattern classification yielded up to 79.3% accuracy (P < .001) by differentiating the 2 depressed groups, training and testing the classifier at one site, and up to 69.0% accuracy (P < .001), training the classifier at one imaging site (Pittsburgh) and testing it at the other independent sample (Münster). Medication load did not alter the pattern of results.
Individuals with UD and those with BD are differentiated by structural abnormalities in neural regions supporting emotion processing. Neuroimaging and multivariate pattern classification techniques are promising tools to differentiate UD from BD and show promise as future diagnostic aids.
大脑中能够准确区分单相抑郁症(UD)和双相抑郁症(BD)的结构异常仍未明确。
首先,研究并比较UD和BD的形态学变化,并在2个独立的神经影像站点重复该发现;其次,使用多变量模式分类技术区分UD和BD。
设计、地点和参与者:在一项2中心横断面研究中,使用3-T磁共振成像在2个独立站点(宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡和德国明斯特)获取结构灰质数据。基于体素的形态学测量用于比较局部灰质和白质体积,一种新颖的模式分类方法用于区分UD和BD,同时在一个影像站点训练分类器并在另一个站点的独立样本中进行测试。匹兹堡的参与者样本于2008年至2012年从匹兹堡大学西部精神病学研究所和诊所招募。明斯特样本于2010年至2012年从明斯特大学精神病学系招募。58名目前患有双相I型障碍的抑郁症患者、58名年龄和性别匹配的单相抑郁症患者以及58名匹配的健康对照在2个站点之间平均分配。
使用磁共振成像检测组间结构差异。使用基于体素的形态学测量进行形态学分析。模式分类技术用于多变量方法。
在两个站点,与UD患者相比,BD患者海马结构和杏仁核的灰质体积减少(蒙特利尔神经病学研究所坐标x = -22,y = -1,z = 20;k = 1938体素;t = 4.75),而与BD患者相比,UD患者前扣带回的灰质体积减少(蒙特利尔神经病学研究所坐标x = -8,y = 32,z = 3;k = 979体素;t = 6.37;所有校正P <.05)。BD患者小脑和海马内的白质体积减少。通过区分两个抑郁症组,在一个站点训练和测试分类器,模式分类的准确率高达79.3%(P <.001),在一个影像站点(匹兹堡)训练分类器并在另一个独立样本(明斯特)进行测试时,准确率高达69.0%(P <.001)。药物负荷并未改变结果模式。
UD患者和BD患者通过支持情绪处理的神经区域的结构异常进行区分。神经影像和多变量模式分类技术是区分UD和BD的有前景的工具,并有望成为未来的诊断辅助手段。