Suppr超能文献

分析特性会影响醛固酮与肾素比值作为原发性醛固酮增多症的筛查工具:德国 Conn 登记研究的结果。

Assay characteristics influence the aldosterone to renin ratio as a screening tool for primary aldosteronism: results of the German Conn's registry.

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.

出版信息

Horm Metab Res. 2013 Jul;45(7):526-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343448. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Abstract

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary arterial hypertension. The aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) is the gold standard for screening, but variability between biochemical methods used remains of concern. The aim of the study was to analyze center-specific features of biochemical diagnostic strategies prior to the 2008 consensus within the German Conn's Registry. The study was designed as a retrospective study in 5 tertiary care hospitals. Patients analyzed for PA between 1990 and 2006 were studied. Characteristics of the assays used to determine ARR during establishing the diagnosis of PA were analyzed in the retrospective part of the German Conn's Registry. Eighty-six out of 484 documented ARR values had to be excluded from further evaluations because the laboratory or the assays were unknown. In the remaining 398 patients ARR was determined using 10 different assay combinations in the centers (aldosterone plus plasma renin activity or concentration). Considerable differences were seen between the mean concentrations for aldosterone (p<0.0001), renin concentration (p<0.001), and renin activity (p=0.009) for the different assays. The differences between the absolute concentrations measured by the different assays also had significant impact upon the resulting mean ratios. If published cutoff values are applied, the use of different commercial assays to determine the ARR in clinical routine results in major differences in positive screening rates. This heterogeneity affects sensitivity and specificity of screening for PA. Our data emphasize the importance of standardized screening procedures, which must include standardization of biochemical methods.

摘要

原醛症(PA)是继发性高血压最常见的病因。醛固酮与肾素比值(ARR)是筛查的金标准,但不同生化方法之间的变异性仍然令人担忧。本研究旨在分析德国康恩登记处 2008 年共识之前各中心生化诊断策略的具体特征。该研究设计为在 5 家三级护理医院进行的回顾性研究。分析了 1990 年至 2006 年间诊断为 PA 的患者。在德国康恩登记处的回顾性部分分析了用于确定 PA 诊断时 ARR 的检测方法的特征。由于实验室或检测方法未知,484 份记录的 ARR 值中有 86 份被排除在进一步评估之外。在剩余的 398 名患者中,使用了 10 种不同的检测组合在中心确定 ARR(醛固酮加血浆肾素活性或浓度)。不同检测方法的醛固酮(p<0.0001)、肾素浓度(p<0.001)和肾素活性(p=0.009)的平均值存在显著差异。不同检测方法测量的绝对浓度之间的差异也对得出的平均比值有显著影响。如果应用已发表的截止值,在临床常规中使用不同的商业检测方法来确定 ARR 会导致阳性筛查率的显著差异。这种异质性影响了 PA 筛查的敏感性和特异性。我们的数据强调了标准化筛查程序的重要性,该程序必须包括生化方法的标准化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验