Zanetta Vitor C, Rosman Brian M, Rowe Courtney K, Buonfiglio Helena B, Passerotti Carlo C, Yu Richard N, Nguyen Hiep T
Department of Urology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Aug;52(8):739-46. doi: 10.1177/0009922813485284. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Classically, presence of fever≥38.0°C is used to distinguish pyelonephritis from cystitis. We analyzed whether this is an appropriate marker to initiate further workup and whether temperature is correlated with urological abnormalities and further surgical or pharmacological intervention.
Children who presented for their first workup of urinary tract infection between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009 were retrospectively selected from our institution. Demographics and clinical details were correlated with the diagnosis of urological abnormalities and requirement for intervention.
Age was the most important variable to predict urological abnormalities. The temperature value of 38.3°C maximized the balance between sensitivity (90%) and specificity (46%) for predicting the need to intervene and the presence of anatomical urological abnormalities.
Young age (≤2 years) and temperature are the best factors to predict further intervention and urological abnormalities, with a temperature value of 38.3°C being a better predictive value than the currently used 38.0°C.
传统上,体温≥38.0°C用于区分肾盂肾炎和膀胱炎。我们分析了这是否是启动进一步检查的合适指标,以及体温是否与泌尿系统异常以及进一步的手术或药物干预相关。
回顾性选取2008年10月1日至2009年9月30日期间在我院首次进行尿路感染检查的儿童。人口统计学和临床细节与泌尿系统异常诊断及干预需求相关。
年龄是预测泌尿系统异常的最重要变量。38.3°C的体温值在预测干预需求和解剖学泌尿系统异常的敏感性(90%)和特异性(46%)之间达到了最佳平衡。
年龄小(≤2岁)和体温是预测进一步干预和泌尿系统异常的最佳因素,38.3°C的体温值比目前使用的38.0°C具有更好的预测价值。