Suppr超能文献

基于文献的随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示新辅助化疗和辅助化疗对鼻咽癌的显著疗效。

Significant efficacies of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma by meta-analysis of published literature-based randomized, controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2136-46. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt146. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We carried out this meta-analysis to demonstrate efficacies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients based on randomized, controlled trials (RCTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We comprehensively searched electronic databases and manuscripts for RCTs and extracted data from eligible studies for meta-analysis. Overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HRs), locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR) with relative risks (RRs) were concerned using random and/or fixed-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

Six trials in NACT group (n = 1418) and five in AC group (n = 1187) were eligible. HR of death for NACT was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.98, P = 0.03], corresponding to an absolute survival gain of 5.13% after 3 years. Significant reduction of DMR (P = 0.0002; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.84) was also found from NACT. But no decrease in LRR (P = 0.49; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66-1.22) was observed. Patients receiving additional AC had lower LRR (P = 0.03; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96). But no benefit of OS and DMR were seen in AC.

CONCLUSIONS

NACT can effectively enhance OS and reduce DMR, not LRR in NPC. And AC only helps to better control locoregional recurrence of NPC.

摘要

背景

我们进行了这项荟萃分析,旨在基于随机对照试验(RCT)证明新辅助化疗(NACT)和辅助化疗(AC)对鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的疗效。

患者和方法

我们全面搜索了电子数据库和手稿中的 RCT,并从合格研究中提取数据进行荟萃分析。使用随机和/或固定效应模型关注总生存(OS)的风险比(HRs)、局部区域复发率(LRR)和远处转移率(DMR)的相对风险(RRs)。还进行了亚组和敏感性分析。

结果

共有 6 项 NACT 组(n = 1418)和 5 项 AC 组(n = 1187)的试验符合条件。NACT 组死亡的 HR 为 0.82 [95%置信区间(CI)0.69-0.98,P = 0.03],对应于 3 年后绝对生存获益 5.13%。还发现 NACT 显著降低了 DMR(P = 0.0002;RR 0.69,95% CI 0.56-0.84)。但 LRR 无降低(P = 0.49;RR 0.90,95% CI 0.66-1.22)。接受额外 AC 的患者 LRR 较低(P = 0.03;RR 0.71,95% CI 0.53-0.96)。但 AC 对 OS 和 DMR 无获益。

结论

NACT 可有效提高 NPC 的 OS 并降低 DMR,而不降低 LRR。AC 仅有助于更好地控制 NPC 的局部区域复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验