Suppr超能文献

一项比较新辅助化疗与同步化疗联合放疗用于局部晚期鼻咽癌的III期随机研究:更新后的长期生存结果

A phase III randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: updated long-term survival outcomes.

作者信息

Xu Tingting, Zhu Guopei, He Xiayun, Ying Hongmei, Hu Chaosu

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2014 Feb;50(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) can improve survival rates compared to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimen in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 338 patients with biopsy-proven NPC were randomly assigned to receive NACT followed by radical radiotherapy (RT) then adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or CCRT followed by AC.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 60 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate did not differ significantly between two groups (75.5% vs 79.4% in CCRT and NACT group respectively, P=0.47, HR=0.84, 95%CI 0.53-1.33). Metastasis-free survival (MFS) rate was significantly improved by the CCRT (79.0% vs 86.9%, P=0.05, HR=0.59, 95%CI 0.35-1.00). Subgroup analysis indicated that the benefit of CCRT was derived from N0/N1 tumors (78.0% vs 93.5%, P=0.05, HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.12-0.99). Higher rates of mucositis (52.4% vs. 35.9% P=0.02) and vomiting (13.7% vs. 4.7% P=0.00) were noted in the CCRT arm. Late toxicities were similar in two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated results demonstrated no significant survival benefit of CCRT over NACT in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. CCRT only showed significant MFS efficacy in T3-4N0-1 populations.

摘要

目的

确定与新辅助化疗(NACT)方案相比,同步放化疗(CCRT)能否提高局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的生存率。

材料与方法

共338例经活检证实为NPC的患者被随机分配接受NACT,随后进行根治性放疗(RT),然后进行辅助化疗(AC),或接受CCRT,随后进行AC。

结果

中位随访60个月,两组的5年总生存率(OS)无显著差异(CCRT组和NACT组分别为75.5%和79.4%,P = 0.47,HR = 0.84,95%CI 0.53 - 1.33)。CCRT显著提高了无转移生存率(MFS)(79.0%对86.9%,P = 0.05,HR = 0.59,95%CI 0.35 - 1.00)。亚组分析表明,CCRT的益处源于N0/N1肿瘤(78.0%对93.5%,P = 0.05,HR = 0.35,95%CI 0.12 - 0.99)。CCRT组的黏膜炎发生率(52.4%对35.9%,P = 0.02)和呕吐发生率(13.7%对4.7%,P = 0.00)更高。两组的晚期毒性相似。

结论

更新后的结果表明,对于局部晚期NPC患者,CCRT与NACT相比在生存方面无显著益处。CCRT仅在T3 - 4N0 - 1人群中显示出显著的MFS疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验