• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Usability Evaluation of An Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Application.电子医嘱记录(eMAR)应用程序的可用性评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jun 15;2(2):202-24. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0004. Print 2011.
2
A continuous usability evaluation of an electronic medication administration record application.电子给药记录应用程序的持续可用性评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1395-1400. doi: 10.1111/jep.12808. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Evaluation of a BCMA's Electronic Medication Administration Record.一种BCMA电子用药记录的评估
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Jul;37(7):899-921. doi: 10.1177/0193945914566641. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
4
Identifying Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Usability Issues from Patient Safety Event Reports.从患者安全事件报告中识别电子医嘱录入系统(eMAR)的可用性问题。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Dec;47(12):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
A Systematic Review of Quantitative Methods for Evaluating Electronic Medication Administration Record and Bar-Coded Medication Administration Usability.电子医嘱录入和条码给药系统可用性的定量评估方法的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):185-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761435. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Safeuristics! Do Heuristic Evaluation Violation Severity Ratings Correlate with Patient Safety Severity Ratings for a Native Electronic Health Record Mobile Application?安全启发法!对于原生电子健康记录移动应用程序,启发式评估违规严重程度评分是否与患者安全严重程度评分相关?
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):210-218. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681073. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Usability of a patient education and motivation tool using heuristic evaluation.使用启发式评估的患者教育与激励工具的可用性
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Nov 6;11(4):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1244.
8
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的电子健康素养需求:可用性的启发式评估
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Oct 1;14(Fall):1f. eCollection 2017 Fall.
9
Systematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians' and Human Factors Engineers' Perspectives.计算机化咨询医嘱模板的系统启发式评估:临床医生和人因工程师的视角。
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug;41(8):129. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0775-7. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
10
Assessing the Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System: Heuristic Evaluation.评估临床决策支持系统的可用性:启发式评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 10;9(2):e31758. doi: 10.2196/31758.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of minimum data set and electronic registry for hemodialysis patients management.用于血液透析患者管理的最小数据集和电子登记系统的开发。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02914-y.
2
Development of minimum data set and dashboard for monitoring adverse events in radiology departments.用于监测放射科不良事件的最小数据集和仪表板的开发。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 24;10(9):e30054. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30054. eCollection 2024 May 15.
3
Design and evaluation of a web-based electronic health record for amblyopia.弱视基于网络的电子健康记录的设计与评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 4;11:1322821. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1322821. eCollection 2024.
4
Methods for studying medication safety following electronic health record implementation in acute care: a scoping review.电子病历实施后研究急性护理药物安全性的方法:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):499-508. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad231.
5
Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.使用认知走查评估癌症登记系统的可用性,并评估用户对其问题的一致性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02120-8.
6
Development and pilot evaluation of an electronic health record usability and safety self-assessment tool.电子健康记录可用性与安全性自我评估工具的开发及初步评估
JAMIA Open. 2022 Jul 30;5(3):ooac070. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac070. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Designing a reference architecture for health information systems.设计健康信息系统的参考架构。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 8;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01570-2.
8
Nursing staff's assessments of medication management process in the psychiatric and operative domains: A cross-sectional study after introduction of an electronic medication chart.护理人员对精神科和外科领域药物管理流程的评估:引入电子药物图表后的横断面研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Dec;36(4):935-946. doi: 10.1111/scs.12989. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
The efficiency and effectiveness of surgery information systems in Iran.伊朗手术信息系统的效率和效果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 16;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01236-5.
10
The relationship between user interface problems of an admission, discharge and transfer module and usability features: a usability testing method.入院、出院和转科模块用户界面问题与可用性特征之间的关系:一种可用性测试方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 24;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0893-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of ICU nurses' use of the clinical information system in Taiwan.台湾重症监护病房护士对临床信息系统使用情况的评估。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Apr;29(4):221-9. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181fcbe3d.
2
Usability evaluation of a computerized physician order entry for medication ordering.用于药物医嘱录入的计算机化医生医嘱录入系统的可用性评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:532-6.
3
Medication errors: problems and recommendations from a consensus meeting.药物错误:共识会议提出的问题和建议。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;67(6):592-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03414.x.
4
Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication error rates in an adult medical intensive care unit.条形码辅助给药对成人医学重症监护病房用药错误率的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jun 15;66(12):1110-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080355.
5
Evaluation of the impact of a CPOE system on nurse-physician communication--a mixed method study.评估计算机化医嘱录入系统对护士与医生沟通的影响——一项混合方法研究。
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(4):350-60. doi: 10.3414/ME0572. Epub 2009 May 15.
6
The state of the evidence for computerized provider order entry: a systematic review and analysis of the quality of the literature.计算机化医嘱录入的证据状况:文献质量的系统评价与分析
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jun;78(6):365-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
7
An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system.对用户与电子健康记录系统交互的界面驱动分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):228-37. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2852. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
8
The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: findings from a mixed methods exploration.计算机化医嘱录入的意外后果:一项混合方法探索的结果
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Apr;78 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
9
Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration.量化给药过程中的护理工作流程。
J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan;38(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000295628.87968.bc.
10
Health information exchange and patient safety.健康信息交换与患者安全。
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

电子医嘱记录(eMAR)应用程序的可用性评估。

Usability Evaluation of An Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Application.

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jun 15;2(2):202-24. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0004. Print 2011.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0004
PMID:23616871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3631925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic medication administration records (eMARs) have been widely used in recent years. However, formal usability evaluations are not yet available for these vendor applications, especially from the perspective of nurses, the largest group of eMAR users.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a formal usability evaluation of an implemented eMAR.

METHODS

Four evaluators examined a commercial vendor eMAR using heuristic evaluation techniques. The evaluators defined seven tasks typical of eMAR use and independently evaluated the application. Consensus techniques were used to obtain 100% agreement of identified usability problems and severity ratings. Findings were reviewed with 5 clinical staff nurses and the Director of Clinical Informatics who verified findings with a small group of clinical nurses.

RESULTS

Evaluators found 60 usability problems categorized into 233 heuristic violations. Match, Error, and Visibility heuristics were the most frequently violated. Administer Medication and Order and Modify Medications tasks had the highest number of heuristic violations and usability problems rated as major or catastrophic.

CONCLUSION

The high number of usability problems could impact the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of nurses' medication administration activities and may include concerns about patient safety. Usability is a joint responsibility between sites and vendors. We offer a call to action for usability evaluations at all sites and eMAR application redesign as necessary to improve the user experience and promote patient safety.

摘要

背景

电子医嘱系统(eMAR)近年来得到了广泛应用。然而,这些供应商应用程序尚未进行正式的可用性评估,特别是从护士的角度来看,护士是最大的 eMAR 用户群体。

目的

对已实施的电子医嘱系统进行正式的可用性评估。

方法

四名评估员使用启发式评估技术对商业供应商的电子医嘱系统进行了检查。评估员定义了七个典型的电子医嘱使用任务,并对应用程序进行了独立评估。采用一致性技术获得了已识别可用性问题和严重程度评级的 100%一致性。评估结果与 5 名临床护士和临床信息学主任进行了审查,他们与一小部分临床护士一起验证了评估结果。

结果

评估员发现了 60 个可用性问题,分为 233 个启发式违规。匹配、错误和可见性启发式是最常被违反的。给药和医嘱及修改医嘱任务的启发式违规和可用性问题最多,被评为主要或灾难性。

结论

大量的可用性问题可能会影响护士给药活动的有效性、效率和满意度,并可能包括对患者安全的担忧。可用性是站点和供应商的共同责任。我们呼吁所有站点进行可用性评估,并根据需要重新设计电子医嘱应用程序,以改善用户体验并促进患者安全。