• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生研究中的性与性别报告:为何加拿大应当成为领导者。

Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader.

机构信息

CIHR Institute of Gender and Health, Vancouver, BC.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2012 Nov 8;104(1):e80-1. doi: 10.1007/BF03405660.

DOI:10.1007/BF03405660
PMID:23618110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6973991/
Abstract

Sex and gender have been demonstrated to influence all domains of health, from basic mechanisms of disease development to health service utilization. It is therefore no longer acceptable to ignore sex and gender issues in health research reports if these reports are to be deemed accurate. Funding agencies and journals have been identified as primary change agents in health research systems. Canada is making progress on the funding side of the equation--applicants to Canada's federal health research funding agency are required to justify why sex and gender are relevant or not to their research designs. We argue that it is now time for Canada's leading health research journals to follow suit. We have a unique opportunity in Canada to demonstrate leadership in doing science better with sex and gender--and we should not let it be missed.

摘要

性别已被证明会影响健康的各个方面,从疾病发展的基本机制到卫生服务的利用。因此,如果要使健康研究报告被认为是准确的,那么在健康研究报告中忽视性别问题已不再被接受。资助机构和期刊已被确定为卫生研究系统中的主要变革推动者。加拿大在资金方面取得了进展——向加拿大联邦卫生研究资助机构申请资金的人必须说明性别与他们的研究设计相关或不相关的原因。我们认为,现在加拿大的主要卫生研究期刊也应该效仿。我们在加拿大有一个独特的机会来展示如何更好地进行有性别差异的科学研究——我们不应该错过这个机会。

相似文献

1
Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader.卫生研究中的性与性别报告:为何加拿大应当成为领导者。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Nov 8;104(1):e80-1. doi: 10.1007/BF03405660.
2
Response to Johnson and Beaudet's commentary: Moving beyond sex and gender reporting in health research.对约翰逊和博德的评论的回应:超越健康研究中的性别与性别的报告。
Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 2;106(3):e165. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5042.
3
Canada's national initiative to advance access to electronic journals.加拿大推动电子期刊获取的国家倡议。
Health Libr Rev. 2000 Dec;17(4):189-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2000.00293.x.
4
The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies.将性别因素纳入生物医学研究的整合:来自国际资助机构的经验教训。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Sep 27;106(10):3034-3048. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab434.
5
Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?与性别整合相关的健康研究资金政策的变化会产生影响吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e99900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099900. eCollection 2014.
6
Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research.除了健康研究资金投入和报告方面的性别差异之外。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Aug 28;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0050-6. eCollection 2018.
7
Recommendations for Canada's National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence: perspectives from leaders, service providers and survivors in Canada's largest city during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大国家行动计划以结束基于性别的暴力行为:来自加拿大最大城市在 COVID-19 大流行期间的领导人、服务提供商和幸存者的观点。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2023 Apr 12;43(4):155-170. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.4.01. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
8
Canada's contribution to global research in cardiovascular diseases.加拿大在心血管疾病全球研究中的贡献。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jun;29(6):742-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
Relationship between quality and editorial leadership of biomedical research journals: a comparative study of Italian and UK journals.生物医学研究期刊的质量与编辑领导力之间的关系:意大利和英国期刊的比较研究
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 2;3(7):e2512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002512.
10
Sex and gender inclusion, analysis, and reporting in anaesthesia research.麻醉学研究中的性别与性取向纳入、分析及报告
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):e43-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of sex/gender-specific medicine in healthcare.性别特异性医学在医疗保健中的应用。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023 Mar;29(1):5-11. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.03.13. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Improving social justice in observational studies: protocol for the development of a global and Indigenous STROBE-equity reporting guideline.改善观察性研究中的社会公平性:制定全球和本土 STROBE 公平报告指南的方案。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01854-1.
3
Standing on the shoulders of bias: lack of transparency and reporting of critical rigor characteristics in pain research.站在偏见的肩膀上:疼痛研究中关键严谨特征的透明度和报告缺失。
Pain. 2023 Aug 1;164(8):1775-1782. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002874. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Protecting the Vulnerable and Including the Under-Represented: IRB Practices and Attitudes.保护弱势群体和代表性不足的人群:IRB 的实践和态度。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Feb-Apr;18(1-2):58-68. doi: 10.1177/15562646221138450. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
The Persistence of Sex Bias in High-Impact Clinical Research.高影响力临床研究中性别偏见的持续存在。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:364-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.077. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
6
Global Research Trends of Gender-Related Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Between 2001-2020: A Bibliometric Study.2001 - 2020年间医学领域性别相关人工智能的全球研究趋势:一项文献计量学研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 17;9:868040. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.868040. eCollection 2022.
7
IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.IRBs 与保护-纳入困境:寻求平衡。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jun;23(6):75-88. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Inclusion of Older Adults in Digital Health Technologies to Support Hospital-to-Home Transitions: Secondary Analysis of a Rapid Review and Equity-Informed Recommendations.将老年人纳入数字健康技术以支持从医院到家庭的过渡:快速综述和基于公平性的建议的二次分析
JMIR Aging. 2022 Apr 27;5(2):e35925. doi: 10.2196/35925.
9
Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research.除了健康研究资金投入和报告方面的性别差异之外。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Aug 28;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0050-6. eCollection 2018.
10
Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study.坎贝尔和 Cochrane 系统评价中的性别报告和分析:一项横断面方法研究。
Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 2;7(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0778-6.

本文引用的文献

1
After inclusion, information and inference: reporting on clinical trials results after 15 years of monitoring inclusion of women.纳入后信息与推断:监测女性纳入情况 15 年后报告临床试验结果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;20(6):829-36. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2527.
2
Males still dominate animal studies.男性仍然主导着动物研究。
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):690. doi: 10.1038/465690a.
3
Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.试验和治疗中的性别偏见必须消除。
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):688-9. doi: 10.1038/465688a.
4
Putting gender on the agenda.将性别议题提上议程。
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):665. doi: 10.1038/465665a.
5
Appraising the evidence: applying sex- and gender-based analysis (SGBA) to Cochrane systematic reviews on cardiovascular diseases.评价证据:将基于性别的分析(SGBA)应用于心血管疾病的 Cochrane 系统评价。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 May;19(5):997-1003. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1626.
6
Biomedical research. Of mice and women: the bias in animal models.生物医学研究。论小鼠与女性:动物模型中的偏见。
Science. 2010 Mar 26;327(5973):1571-2. doi: 10.1126/science.327.5973.1571.
7
Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿司匹林用于女性和男性心血管事件的一级预防:一项针对随机对照试验的性别特异性荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):306-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.306.
8
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE): Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE):向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求:生物医学出版物的写作与编辑
Haematologica. 2004 Mar;89(3):264.
9
Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections--and why does it matter?性别、性与健康:它们之间有何联系——为何这很重要?
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;32(4):652-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg156.