• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于综合证据的贝叶斯方法。置信度概况法。

A Bayesian method for synthesizing evidence. The Confidence Profile Method.

作者信息

Eddy D M, Hasselblad V, Shachter R

机构信息

Duke University.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(1):31-55. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008928.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300008928
PMID:2361818
Abstract

This article describes a collection of meta-analysis techniques based on Bayesian statistics for interpreting, adjusting, and combining evidence to estimate parameters and outcomes important to the assessment of health technologies. The result of an analysis by the Confidence Profile Method is a joint posterior probability distribution for the parameters of interest, from which marginal distributions for any particular parameter can be calculated. The method can be used to analyze problems involving a variety of types of outcomes, a variety of measures of effect, and a variety of experimental designs. This article presents the elements necessary for analysis, including prior distributions, likelihood functions, and specific models for experimental designs that include adjustment for biases.

摘要

本文介绍了一系列基于贝叶斯统计的荟萃分析技术,用于解释、调整和合并证据,以估计对卫生技术评估至关重要的参数和结果。置信剖面法的分析结果是感兴趣参数的联合后验概率分布,从中可以计算任何特定参数的边际分布。该方法可用于分析涉及多种类型结果、多种效应度量和多种实验设计的问题。本文介绍了分析所需的要素,包括先验分布、似然函数以及包含偏差调整的实验设计的具体模型。

相似文献

1
A Bayesian method for synthesizing evidence. The Confidence Profile Method.一种用于综合证据的贝叶斯方法。置信度概况法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(1):31-55. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008928.
2
An introduction to a Bayesian method for meta-analysis: The confidence profile method.贝叶斯荟萃分析方法介绍:置信轮廓法
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):15-23. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000104.
3
The confidence profile method: a Bayesian method for assessing health technologies.可信度概况法:一种评估卫生技术的贝叶斯方法。
Oper Res. 1989 Mar-Apr;37(2):210-28. doi: 10.1287/opre.37.2.210.
4
A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.元方法比较:综合间接效应。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Nov;11(6):849-865. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1445. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.卫生技术评估中的贝叶斯方法:综述
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(38):1-130.
6
The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.贝叶斯新统计:从贝叶斯视角看假设检验、估计、元分析和功效分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):178-206. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.
7
A Bayesian bias-adjusted random-effects model for synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions.贝叶斯偏倚调整的随机效应模型,用于综合来自干预措施的随机对照试验和非随机研究的证据。
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Sep;17(3):550-558. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12633. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
8
Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.贝叶斯二元诊断试验研究的综合嵌套拉普拉斯逼近的荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2010 May 30;29(12):1325-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.3858.
9
[Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].依靠你的信念。贝叶斯方法——而非P值——衡量可信度。
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jul 11;98(28-29):3208-11.
10
Bayesian inference for psychometric functions.心理测量函数的贝叶斯推断。
J Vis. 2005 May 27;5(5):478-92. doi: 10.1167/5.5.8.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of network meta-analysis.网络荟萃分析的发展。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Aug;115(8):313-321. doi: 10.1177/01410768221113196.
2
Comparison of Guidelines on Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (EAU, CUA, AUA, NCCN, NICE).非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南(欧洲泌尿外科学会、加拿大泌尿外科学会、美国泌尿外科学会、美国国立综合癌症网络、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所)比较
Bladder Cancer. 2016 Jan 7;2(1):27-36. doi: 10.3233/BLC-150034.
3
BAYESIAN METHODS FOR GENETIC ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS WITH HETEROGENEOUS SUBGROUPS: FROM META-ANALYSES TO GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS.
用于异质子组遗传关联分析的贝叶斯方法:从荟萃分析到基因-环境相互作用
Ann Appl Stat. 2014;8(1):176-203. doi: 10.1214/13-AOAS695.
4
Checking whether there is an increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and other cancers with specific modern immunosuppression regimens in renal transplantation: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.在肾移植中,使用特定现代免疫抑制方案检查移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病及其他癌症的风险是否增加:一项关于随机和观察性研究的网状Meta分析方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 22;3:16. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-16.
5
The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women.九种骨质疏松症药物在降低绝经后妇女骨折发生率方面的相对疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Sep 26;12:209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-209.
6
The crossroads of evidence-based medicine and health policy: implications for urology.循证医学与卫生政策的十字路口:对泌尿科的影响。
World J Urol. 2011 Jun;29(3):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0643-2. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
7
Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values: challenges and solutions.系统评价支持营养素参考摄入量值的制定:挑战与解决方案。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;92(2):273-6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29092. Epub 2010 May 26.
8
Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models.处理成本效益模型中的不确定性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 May;17(5):479-500. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017050-00006.
9
The statistical basis of public policy: a paradigm shift is overdue.公共政策的统计基础:范式转变刻不容缓。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):603-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.603.
10
Bayesian statistical methods.贝叶斯统计方法。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):569-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.569.