von Leden Ramona E, Cooney Sean J, Ferrara Teresa M, Zhao Yujia, Dalgard Clifton L, Anders Juanita J, Byrnes Kimberly R
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
Lasers Surg Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):253-63. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22133.
Despite the success of using photobiomodulation (PBM), also known as low level light therapy, in promoting recovery after central nervous system (CNS) injury, the effect of PBM on microglia, the primary mediators of immune and inflammatory response in the CNS, remains unclear. Microglia exhibit a spectrum of responses to injury, with partial or full polarization into pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Pro-inflammatory (M1 or classically activated) microglia contribute to chronic inflammation and neuronal toxicity, while anti-inflammatory (M2 or alternatively activated) microglia play a role in wound healing and tissue repair; microglia can fall anywhere along this spectrum in response to stimulation.
The effect of PBM on microglial polarization therefore was investigated using colorimetric assays, immunocytochemistry, proteomic profiling and RT-PCR in vitro after exposure of primary microglia or BV2 microglial cell line to PBM of differing energy densities (0.2, 4, 10, and 30 J/cm(2) , 808 nm wavelength, 50 mW output power).
PBM has a dose-dependent effect on the spectrum of microglial M1 and M2 polarization. Specifically, PBM with energy densities between 4 and 30 J/cm(2) induced expression of M1 markers in microglia. Markers of the M2 phenotype, including CD206 and TIMP1, were observed at lower energy densities of 0.2-10 J/cm(2) . In addition, co-culture of PBM or control-treated microglia with primary neuronal cultures demonstrated a dose-dependent effect of PBM on microglial-induced neuronal growth and neurite extension.
These data suggest that the Arndt-Schulz law as applied to PBM for a specific bioassay does not hold true in cells with a spectrum of responses, and that PBM can alter microglial phenotype across this spectrum in a dose-dependent manner. These data are therefore of important relevance to not only therapies in the CNS but also to understanding of PBM effects and mechanisms.
尽管光生物调节作用(PBM),即低强度光疗法,在促进中枢神经系统(CNS)损伤后的恢复方面取得了成功,但PBM对小胶质细胞(CNS中免疫和炎症反应的主要介质)的影响仍不清楚。小胶质细胞对损伤表现出一系列反应,部分或完全极化形成促炎和抗炎表型。促炎(M1或经典激活)小胶质细胞会导致慢性炎症和神经元毒性,而抗炎(M2或替代性激活)小胶质细胞在伤口愈合和组织修复中发挥作用;小胶质细胞在受到刺激后可处于这一反应谱的任何位置。
因此,在原代小胶质细胞或BV2小胶质细胞系暴露于不同能量密度(0.2、4、10和30 J/cm²,波长808 nm,输出功率50 mW)的PBM后,使用比色法、免疫细胞化学、蛋白质组分析和体外逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)研究PBM对小胶质细胞极化的影响。
PBM对小胶质细胞M1和M2极化谱具有剂量依赖性效应。具体而言,能量密度在4至30 J/cm²之间的PBM诱导小胶质细胞中M1标志物的表达。在较低能量密度0.2至10 J/cm²时观察到M2表型的标志物,包括CD206和金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子1(TIMP1)。此外,将经PBM或对照处理的小胶质细胞与原代神经元培养物共培养,结果表明PBM对小胶质细胞诱导的神经元生长和神经突延伸具有剂量依赖性效应。
这些数据表明,应用于特定生物测定的PBM的阿恩特-舒尔茨定律在具有一系列反应的细胞中并不成立,并且PBM可以以剂量依赖的方式改变整个反应谱中的小胶质细胞表型。因此,这些数据不仅与CNS中的治疗方法相关,而且对于理解PBM的作用和机制也具有重要意义。