• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用同种语言?畅销处方药伴随的安全信息在国际上存在差异。

Speaking the same language? International variations in the safety information accompanying top-selling prescription drugs.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):727-34. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001704. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001704
PMID:23620531
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The official prescribing information document distributed with a prescription drug is a key source of safety information, but it may include excessive or insufficient details.

OBJECTIVES

To compare prescribing information approved by the US Food and Drug Administration with the UK, Canada and Australia to identify content differences in safety warnings.

METHODS

For 20 top-selling prescription drugs, we used an automated natural language processing tool to calculate the number and severity of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We fit hierarchical Poisson models and included fixed effects for other prescribing information characteristics. Separately, we analysed the appearance and content of 'black box' warnings.

RESULTS

There was substantial variation in safety content of approved prescribing information. Canada had the highest median ADRs per drug (138 (IQR 86-234)) and the UK had the lowest (84 (IQR 51-111)). The number of ADRs reported was on average 50% higher in Canada compared with the USA (ratio of ADRs/document: 1.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.6, p<0.001). By contrast, there were on average 15% fewer ADRs listed in the UK compared with the USA (ratio of ADRs/document 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.93, p<0.001), and 21% fewer ADRs listed in Australia compared with the USS (ratio of ADRs/document 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.85, p<0.001). There were no variations in ADR severity. The presence and qualitative content of boxed warnings also showed substantial diversity.

CONCLUSIONS

International variations exist in the presentation of safety data in drug prescribing information, which may have important implications for patient safety. Better international coordination is necessary to enhance use of this information for patient decision-making.

摘要

背景

与处方药一起分发的官方处方信息文件是安全性信息的主要来源,但其中可能包含过多或过少的细节。

目的

将美国食品和药物管理局批准的处方信息与英国、加拿大和澳大利亚进行比较,以确定安全性警告中的内容差异。

方法

对于 20 种最畅销的处方药,我们使用自动自然语言处理工具计算报告的不良药物反应(ADR)的数量和严重程度。我们拟合了分层泊松模型,并包括了其他处方信息特征的固定效应。另外,我们分析了“黑框”警告的出现和内容。

结果

批准的处方信息的安全性内容存在很大差异。加拿大每一种药物的平均 ADR 最高(138(IQR 86-234)),而英国最低(84(IQR 51-111))。与美国相比,加拿大报告的 ADR 数量平均高出 50%(ADR/文件的比值为 1.5,95%CI 为 1.4 至 1.6,p<0.001)。相比之下,与美国相比,英国列出的 ADR 数量平均减少了 15%(ADR/文件的比值为 0.85(95%CI 为 0.78 至 0.93,p<0.001),澳大利亚列出的 ADR 数量平均减少了 21%(ADR/文件的比值为 0.79,95%CI 为 0.74 至 0.85,p<0.001)。ADR 的严重程度没有差异。框警告的存在和定性内容也存在很大差异。

结论

药物处方信息中安全性数据的呈现方式存在国际差异,这可能对患者安全产生重要影响。为了增强患者决策中对该信息的使用,有必要进行更好的国际协调。

相似文献

1
Speaking the same language? International variations in the safety information accompanying top-selling prescription drugs.使用同种语言?畅销处方药伴随的安全信息在国际上存在差异。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):727-34. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001704. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
2
Adverse drug reaction labelling for atomoxetine, methylphenidate and modafinil: comparison of product information for oral formulations in Australia, Denmark and the United States.托莫西汀、哌甲酯和莫达非尼的药品不良反应标签:澳大利亚、丹麦和美国口服制剂产品信息比较
Curr Drug Saf. 2013 Jul;8(3):162-8.
3
Bringing greater transparency to "black box" warnings.提高“黑箱”警告的透明度。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011 Jul;49(6):448-51. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.593523.
4
Consistency in the safety labeling of bioequivalent medications.生物等效药物安全性标签的一致性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):294-301. doi: 10.1002/pds.3351. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
5
Different indications, warnings and precautions, and contraindications for the same drug--an international comparison of prescribing information for commonly used psychiatric drugs.同一药物的不同适应证、警示和注意事项及禁忌证——常用精神科药物说明书的国际比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):329-33. doi: 10.1002/pds.3389. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
6
Variation in adverse drug reactions listed in product information for antidepressants and anticonvulsants, between the USA and Europe: a comparison review of paired regulatory documents.美国与欧洲抗抑郁药和抗惊厥药产品信息中列出的药物不良反应差异:配对监管文件的比较综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 20;6(3):e010599. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010599.
7
Study of serious adverse drug reactions using FDA-approved drug labeling and MedDRA.使用 FDA 批准的药品标签和 MedDRA 研究严重药物不良反应。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Mar 14;20(Suppl 2):97. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2628-5.
8
Black box warning contraindicated comedications: concordance among three major drug interaction screening programs.黑框警告禁忌合并用药:三种主要药物相互作用筛选程序的一致性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Jan;44(1):28-34. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M475. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
9
Medication safety: opening up the black box.药物安全性:打开黑匣子
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):702-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002238. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
10
FDA boxed warnings: how to prescribe drugs safely.FDA 黑框警告:安全用药之道。
Am Fam Physician. 2010 Feb 1;81(3):298-303.

引用本文的文献

1
Warning Labels as a Public Health Intervention: Effects and Challenges for Tobacco, Cannabis, and Opioid Medications.警示标签作为一种公共卫生干预措施:对烟草、大麻和阿片类药物的影响和挑战。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):425-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-042254. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Regulatory Safety Learning Driven by the Mechanism of Action: The Case of TNF-α Inhibitors.基于作用机制的监管安全学习:TNF-α 抑制剂案例。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):123-131. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2127. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
International Coherence of Pediatric Drug Labeling for Drug Safety: Comparison of Approved Labels in Korea and the United States.
儿科药物标签的国际一致性以确保药物安全:韩国和美国批准标签的比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;107(3):530-540. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1640. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
4
Development and evaluation of user-tested Thai patient information leaflets for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Effect on patients' knowledge.用户测试的泰语非甾体抗炎药患者信息传单的开发和评估:对患者知识的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210395. eCollection 2019.
5
Transnational pharmacogovernance: emergent patterns in the jazz of pharmaceutical policy convergence.跨国药物治理:药物政策趋同爵士乐中的新兴模式。
Global Health. 2018 Aug 22;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0402-5.
6
Variation in adverse drug reactions listed in product information for antidepressants and anticonvulsants, between the USA and Europe: a comparison review of paired regulatory documents.美国与欧洲抗抑郁药和抗惊厥药产品信息中列出的药物不良反应差异:配对监管文件的比较综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 20;6(3):e010599. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010599.
7
Medicine information leaflets for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Thailand.泰国非甾体抗炎药的药品信息单页
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):25-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0220-2. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA.丹麦和美国监管机构提供的药品产品信息中列出的不良反应差异。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2014 Jun;2(3):e00038. doi: 10.1002/prp2.38. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
9
Comparison of pregnancy and lactation labeling for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder drugs marketed in Australia, the USA, Denmark, and the UK.澳大利亚、美国、丹麦和英国市场上销售的注意力缺陷多动障碍药物的妊娠和哺乳期标签比较。
Drug Saf. 2014 Oct;37(10):805-13. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0215-2.