Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 May-Jun;45(3):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.10.007.
Compare weight loss and maintenance between a face-to-face (FTF) weight management clinic and a clinic delivered via virtual reality (VR).
Participants were randomized to 3 months of weight loss with a weekly clinic delivered via FTF or VR and then 6 months' weight maintenance delivered with VR. Data were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months for weight and process variables. Twenty overweight and obese individuals (31.1 ± 3.6 years of age; body mass index, 32.8 ± 5.1; 85% females; 20% minorities) responded to advertisement and met inclusion criteria. Diets (1,200-1,800 kcal/d) used prepackaged meals, fruits and vegetables, and physical activity (300 min/wk).
Weight loss was significantly greater for FTF at 10.8% compared with 7.6% for VR (P < .05). However, weight maintenance was significantly greater for VR at 14.0% compared with 9.5% for FTF (P < .05).
Virtual reality compares favorably with FTF for weight loss and may facilitate greater weight maintenance.
比较面对面(FTF)体重管理诊所和虚拟现实(VR)诊所的减肥效果和维持效果。
参与者被随机分配到为期 3 个月的减肥阶段,每周接受 FTF 或 VR 诊所治疗,然后接受 6 个月的 VR 体重维持治疗。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时收集体重和过程变量的数据。20 名超重和肥胖者(31.1±3.6 岁;体重指数,32.8±5.1;85%女性;20%少数民族)对广告做出回应并符合纳入标准。饮食(1200-1800kcal/d)使用预包装的膳食、水果和蔬菜以及体力活动(300 分钟/周)。
FTF 的减肥效果显著优于 VR,为 10.8%,而 VR 的减肥效果为 7.6%(P<.05)。然而,VR 的体重维持效果显著优于 FTF,为 14.0%,而 FTF 的体重维持效果为 9.5%(P<.05)。
虚拟现实在减肥方面与 FTF 相当,并且可能更有利于体重维持。