Seyedmajidi Seyedali, Mirsattari Dariush, Zojaji Homayoun, Zanganeh Elahe, Seyyedmajidi Mohammadreza, Almasi Shohreh, Zali Mohammadreza
Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
BACKGROUND & STUDY AIMS: Selection of the best drug regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection especially in patients at risk of peptic ulcer relapses and the development of complications is challenging. This study assessed and compared the efficacy of the two common PPI based triple therapies to a quadruple therapy including PPI, metronidazole, amoxicillin and a bismuth compound in Iranian population.
PATIENTS & METHODS: Three hundred and thirty patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment protocols all given twice daily: (a) A 14-day quadruple therapy (OMAB group) comprising omeprazole 20mg, metronicazole 500 mg, amoxicillin 1g, and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg; (b) A 14-day triple regimen (OCP group) comprising omeprazole 20mg plus clarithromycine 500 mg and penbactam 750 mg and (c) A 14-day triple regimen (OCA group) comprising omeprazole 20mg plus clarithromycine 500 mg and amoxicillin 1g. Cure was defined as a negative urea breath test at least six weeks after treatment.
The per-protocol eradication rates achieved with both OCP regimen (87.0%) and OCA treatment (90.8%) were significantly higher than the OMAB treatment protocol (56.0%); however, no significant difference emerged in eradication rates between the two triple treatment schedules. No significant differences between the groups were found in most side-effects.
Two-week quadruple therapy showed a lower eradication rate compared to common triple treatment schedules when used as first-line eradication treatment for H. pylori infection in Iranian population.
选择最佳药物方案以根除幽门螺杆菌感染,尤其是对于有消化性溃疡复发风险和并发症发生风险的患者而言具有挑战性。本研究评估并比较了两种常见的基于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的三联疗法与一种包含PPI、甲硝唑、阿莫西林和一种铋剂的四联疗法在伊朗人群中的疗效。
330例患有消化性溃疡且感染幽门螺杆菌的患者纳入本研究。患者被随机分配至三种治疗方案中的一种,所有方案均每日给药两次:(a)一种14天的四联疗法(OMAB组),包括奥美拉唑20mg、甲硝唑500mg、阿莫西林1g和枸橼酸铋钾240mg;(b)一种14天的三联方案(OCP组),包括奥美拉唑20mg加克拉霉素500mg和哌拉西林750mg;(c)一种14天的三联方案(OCA组),包括奥美拉唑20mg加克拉霉素500mg和阿莫西林1g。治愈定义为治疗后至少六周尿素呼气试验阴性。
OCP方案(87.0%)和OCA治疗(90.8%)的符合方案根除率均显著高于OMAB治疗方案(56.0%);然而,两种三联治疗方案的根除率之间未出现显著差异。在大多数副作用方面,各组之间未发现显著差异。
在伊朗人群中,当用作幽门螺杆菌感染的一线根除治疗时,两周的四联疗法与常见的三联治疗方案相比显示出较低的根除率。