State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.048. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
The aims of this study were to assess (1) the relationship between interocular suppression and visual function in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, (2) whether suppression can be simulated in matched controls using monocular defocus or neutral density filters, (3) the effects of spectacle or rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction on suppression in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, and (4) the relationship between interocular suppression and outcomes of occlusion therapy.
Case-control study (aims 1-3) and cohort study (aim 4).
Forty-five participants with anisometropic amblyopia and 45 matched controls (mean age, 8.8 years for both groups).
Interocular suppression was assessed using Bagolini striated lenses, neutral density filters, and an objective psychophysical technique that measures the amount of contrast imbalance between the 2 eyes that is required to overcome suppression (dichoptic motion coherence thresholds). Visual acuity was assessed using a logarithm minimum angle of resolution tumbling E chart and stereopsis using the Randot preschool test.
Interocular suppression assessed using dichoptic motion coherence thresholds.
Patients exhibited significantly stronger suppression than controls, and stronger suppression was correlated significantly with poorer visual acuity in amblyopic eyes. Reducing monocular acuity in controls to match that of cases using neutral density filters (luminance reduction) resulted in levels of interocular suppression comparable with that in patients. This was not the case for monocular defocus (optical blur). Rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction resulted in less suppression than spectacle correction, and stronger suppression was associated with poorer outcomes after occlusion therapy.
Interocular suppression plays a key role in the visual deficits associated with anisometropic amblyopia and can be simulated in controls by inducing a luminance difference between the eyes. Accurate quantification of suppression using the dichoptic motion coherence threshold technique may provide useful information for the management and treatment of anisometropic amblyopia.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
本研究旨在评估:(1)双眼抑制与屈光参差性弱视患者视觉功能的关系;(2)使用单眼离焦或中性密度滤光片能否在匹配的对照组中模拟抑制;(3)框架眼镜或透气性硬性角膜接触镜矫正对屈光参差性弱视患者抑制的影响;(4)双眼抑制与遮盖治疗效果的关系。
病例对照研究(目的 1-3)和队列研究(目的 4)。
45 名屈光参差性弱视患者和 45 名匹配的对照组(平均年龄:两组均为 8.8 岁)。
使用巴克林条纹透镜、中性密度滤光片和一种客观的心理物理学技术评估双眼抑制,该技术测量克服抑制所需的双眼对比度失衡程度(双眼运动相干阈值)。使用对数最小角度分辨率翻转 E 图表评估视力,使用 Randot 学前测试评估立体视。
双眼运动相干阈值评估的双眼抑制。
患者的抑制作用明显强于对照组,且抑制作用越强,弱视眼的视力越差。使用中性密度滤光片(降低亮度)将对照组的单眼视力降低至与病例相匹配的水平,可产生与患者相似的双眼抑制程度。而使用单眼离焦(光学模糊)则不是这样。透气性硬性角膜接触镜矫正的抑制作用比框架眼镜矫正小,且抑制作用越强,遮盖治疗后的效果越差。
双眼抑制在屈光参差性弱视相关的视觉缺陷中起关键作用,通过在双眼之间产生亮度差异,可以在对照组中模拟双眼抑制。使用双眼运动相干阈值技术准确量化抑制作用,可能为屈光参差性弱视的管理和治疗提供有用信息。
参考文献之后可能会有专有或商业披露。