Orduña Vladimir, Valencia-Torres Lourdes, Cruz Guadalupe, Bouzas Arturo
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. 04510, Mexico.
Behav Processes. 2013 Sep;98:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
Previous research has provided discrepant results about how reinforcement delay and magnitude are combined to determine the value of the alternatives in concurrent-chains schedules. In the present experiment, we analyzed a possible interaction between these characteristics of reinforcement, employing a two component concurrent-chains schedule, with rats as experimental subjects. Non-independent VI schedules were presented in the initial links of each component. In the terminal links, the following pairs of delays to reinforcement were presented in 4 conditions: 2-28, 6-24, 24-6, 28-2s (fixed time schedules for a group, fixed interval schedules for the other). Magnitude of reinforcement was maintained constant within components: one pellet for one component, and four pellets for the other. The results indicated that in both groups, the sensitivity to delay - calculated according to the generalized matching law - was higher in the component with the larger reinforcer. This result is in contrast with those reported in the literature of temporal discounting with human participants.
先前的研究对于强化延迟和强化量如何结合以确定并发链程序中备择方案的价值给出了不一致的结果。在本实验中,我们以大鼠为实验对象,采用双成分并发链程序,分析了强化的这些特征之间可能存在的相互作用。在每个成分的初始链节中呈现非独立的可变间隔(VI)程序。在终端链节中,在4种条件下呈现以下几对强化延迟:2 - 28、6 - 24、24 - 6、28 - 2秒(一组为固定时间程序,另一组为固定间隔程序)。强化量在各成分内保持恒定:一个成分是一粒食丸,另一个成分是四粒食丸。结果表明,在两组中,根据广义匹配法则计算的对延迟的敏感性在强化物较大的成分中更高。这一结果与人类参与者时间折扣文献中所报道的结果相反。