• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类在自我控制选择情境中的选择:对强化物数量、强化物延迟和整体强化密度的敏感度。

Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.

作者信息

Ito M, Nakamura K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Osaka City University, Japan.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):87-102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-87.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-87
PMID:9465415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284649/
Abstract

Human subjects were exposed to a concurrent-chains schedule in which reinforcer amounts, delays, or both were varied in the terminal links, and consummatory responses were required to receive points that were later exchangeable for money. Two independent variable-interval 30-s schedules were in effect during the initial links, and delay periods were defined by fixed-time schedules. In Experiment 1, subjects were exposed to three different pairs of reinforcer amounts and delays, and sensitivity to reinforcer amount and delay was determined based on the generalized matching law. The relative responding (choice) of most subjects was more sensitive to reinforcer amount than to reinforcer delay. In Experiment 2, subjects chose between immediate smaller reinforcers and delayed larger reinforcers in five conditions with and without timeout periods that followed a shorter delay, in which reinforcer amounts and delays were combined to make different predictions based on local reinforcement density (i.e., points per delay) or overall reinforcement density (i.e., points per total time). In most conditions, subjects' choices were qualitatively in accord with the predictions from the overall reinforcement density calculated by the ratio of reinforcer amount and total time. Therefore, the overall reinforcement density appears to influence the preference of humans in the present self-control choice situation.

摘要

人类被试接受了一种并发链程序,其中强化物数量、延迟或两者在终端链中都有所变化,并且需要做出 consummatory 反应才能获得积分,这些积分随后可兑换成金钱。在初始链中,两个独立的 30 秒可变间隔程序生效,延迟期由固定时间程序定义。在实验 1 中,被试接触了三对不同的强化物数量和延迟,并根据广义匹配定律确定了对强化物数量和延迟的敏感性。大多数被试的相对反应(选择)对强化物数量比对强化物延迟更敏感。在实验 2 中,被试在即时较小强化物和延迟较大强化物之间进行选择,有五种条件,包括有和没有在较短延迟后出现的超时时段,其中强化物数量和延迟相结合,根据局部强化密度(即每延迟的积分)或整体强化密度(即每总时间的积分)做出不同预测。在大多数条件下,被试的选择在质量上符合通过强化物数量与总时间的比率计算出的整体强化密度的预测。因此,在当前的自我控制选择情境中,整体强化密度似乎会影响人类的偏好。

相似文献

1
Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.人类在自我控制选择情境中的选择:对强化物数量、强化物延迟和整体强化密度的敏感度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):87-102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-87.
2
Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.自我控制选择中对强化物前后延迟的敏感性。
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
3
Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.鸽子和人类在并发链强化程序下的选择决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):97-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-97.
4
Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.冲动与自控选择之间的偏好逆转。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):260-76. doi: 10.1002/jeab.23. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
5
Relative sensitivity to reinforcer amount and delay in a self-control choice situation.在自我控制选择情境中对强化物数量和延迟的相对敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Sep;66(2):219-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-219.
6
Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount: Effects of the method of reinforcer delivery.人类对强化物数量变化的敏感性:强化物传递方法的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):33-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-33.
7
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
8
Self-control in mentally retarded adolescents: choice as a function of amount and delay of reinforcement.智障青少年的自我控制:作为强化量和强化延迟函数的选择
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):191-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-191.
9
Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.甲基苯丙胺对自我控制选择影响的定量分析:对阐明药物作用行为机制的启示
Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):213-33. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.006.
10
Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.在自我控制范式中强化延迟期间的反应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):267-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-267.

引用本文的文献

1
Addiction is driven by excessive goal-directed drug choice under negative affect: translational critique of habit and compulsion theory.成瘾是由消极情绪下过度的目标导向药物选择驱动的:对习惯和强迫理论的翻译批评。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Apr;45(5):720-735. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0600-8. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Alcohol use disorder symptoms are associated with greater relative value ascribed to alcohol, but not greater discounting of costs imposed on alcohol.酒精使用障碍症状与更高的相对酒精价值评定有关,但与对酒精所带来的代价的折扣无关。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Aug;235(8):2257-2266. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4922-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.重新评估跨期选择:人类在觅食任务中的决策比在自我控制任务中更具优化性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00095. eCollection 2015.
4
Sensitivity to changing contingencies in an impulsivity task.对冲动任务中变化的偶然性的敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):335-45. doi: 10.1002/jeab.24. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
5
Enhanced stimulus sequence-dependent repeated learning in male offspring after prenatal stress alone or in conjunction with lead exposure.单独的产前应激或与铅暴露联合作用后雄性后代的刺激序列相关的重复学习增强。
Neurotoxicology. 2012 Oct;33(5):1188-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
6
Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans.哌甲酯对成年人类冲动选择的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Dec;170(4):390-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1547-2. Epub 2003 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains.在同时进行的连锁反应中,强化时距和幅度的独立性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 May;63(3):255-76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-255.
2
Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.选择和强化物的延迟:终端线索刺激和反应条件的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):361-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-361.
3
Human self-control and the density of reinforcement.人类的自我控制与强化物的密度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):201-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-201.
4
Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount: Effects of the method of reinforcer delivery.人类对强化物数量变化的敏感性:强化物传递方法的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):33-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-33.
5
Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.自我控制范式中的选择:基于经验差异的量化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):53-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53.
6
Choice: Some quantitative relations.选择:一些定量关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-1.
7
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.激励理论:二、选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
8
Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement.大鼠在同时链安排中的选择行为:强化物的数量和延迟。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):383-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-383.
9
Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self control.在不同数量和延迟的奖励之间进行选择:自我控制的选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):135-47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-135.
10
Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.无指导的人类反应:对比率和间隔关联的敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453.