Suppr超能文献

城市与农村因素对成人哮喘的影响。

Urban vs. rural factors that affect adult asthma.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;226:33-63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6898-1_2.

Abstract

In this review, our aim was to examine the influence of geographic variations on asthma prevalence and morbidity among adults, which is important for improving our understanding, identifying the burden, and for developing and implementing interventions aimed at reducing asthma morbidity. Asthma is a complex inflammatory disease of multifactorial origin, and is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. The disparities in asthma prevalence and morbidity among the world's geographic locations are more likely to be associated with environmental exposures than genetic differences. In writing this article, we found that the indoor factors most consistently associated with asthma and asthma-related symptoms in adults included fuel combustion, mold growth, and environmental tobacco smoke in both urban and rural areas. Asthma and asthma-related symptoms occurred more frequently in urban than in rural areas, and that difference correlated with environmental risk exposures, SES, and healthcare access. Environmental risk factors to which urban adults were more frequently exposed than rural adults were dust mites,high levels of vehicle emissions, and a westernized lifestyle.Exposure to indoor biological contaminants in the urban environment is common.The main risk factors for developing asthma in urban areas are atopy and allergy to house dust mites, followed by allergens from animal dander. House dust mite exposure may potentially explain differences in diagnosis of asthma prevalence and morbidity among adults in urban vs. rural areas. In addition, the prevalence of asthma morbidity increases with urbanization. High levels of vehicle emissions,Western lifestyles and degree of urbanization itself, may affect outdoor and thereby indoor air quality. In urban areas, biomass fuels have been widely replaced by cleaner energy sources at home, such as gas and electricity, but in most developing countries, coal is still a major source of fuel for cooking and heating, particularly in winter. Moreover, exposure to ETS is common at home or at work in urban areas.There is evidence that asthma prevalence and morbidity is less common in rural than in urban areas. The possible reasons are that rural residents are exposed early in life to stables and to farm milk production, and such exposures are protective against developing asthma morbidity. Even so, asthma morbidity is disproportionately high among poor inner-city residents and in rural populations. A higher proportion of adult residents of nonmetropolitan areas were characterized as follows:aged 55 years or older, no previous college admission, low household income, no health insurance coverage, and could not see a doctor due to healthcare service availability, etc. In rural areas, biomass fuels meet more than 70% of the rural energy needs. Progress in adopting modern energy sources in rural areas has been slow. The most direct health impact comes from household energy use among the poor, who depend almost entirely on burning biomass fuels in simple cooking devices that are placed in inadequately ventilated spaces. Prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term effects of biomass smoke on lung health among adults in rural areas.Geographic differences in asthma susceptibility exist around the world. The reason for the differences in asthma prevalence in rural and urban areas may be due to the fact that populations have different lifestyles and cultures, as well as different environmental exposures and different genetic backgrounds. Identifying geographic disparities in asthma hospitalizations is critical to implementing prevention strategies,reducing morbidity, and improving healthcare financing for clinical asthma treatment. Although evidence shows that differences in the prevalence of asthma do exist between urban and rural dwellers in many parts of the world, including in developed countries, data are inadequate to evaluate the extent to which different pollutant exposures contribute to asthma morbidity and severity of asthma between urban and rural areas.

摘要

在本次综述中,我们的目的是研究地理差异对成年人哮喘患病率和发病率的影响,这对于增进我们对哮喘的认识、确定疾病负担,以及制定和实施旨在降低哮喘发病率的干预措施非常重要。哮喘是一种复杂的、具有多种病因的炎症性疾病,受到环境和遗传因素的共同影响。世界不同地理位置的哮喘患病率和发病率的差异很可能与环境暴露有关,而不是遗传差异。在撰写本文时,我们发现,在城市和农村地区,与哮喘和与哮喘相关的症状最常相关的室内因素包括燃料燃烧、霉菌生长和城乡地区的环境烟草烟雾。城市成年人比农村成年人更常发生哮喘和与哮喘相关的症状,这种差异与环境风险暴露、社会经济地位和获得医疗保健的机会有关。城市成年人比农村成年人更常接触的环境风险因素包括尘螨、高水平的车辆排放物和西方化的生活方式。城市环境中室内生物污染物的暴露很常见。城市成年人患哮喘的主要危险因素是特应性和对屋尘螨过敏,其次是动物皮屑过敏原。屋尘螨暴露可能是造成城市和农村地区成年人哮喘诊断率差异的潜在原因。此外,哮喘发病率随着城市化的发展而增加。高水平的车辆排放物、西方化的生活方式和城市化程度本身可能会影响室外空气质量,从而影响室内空气质量。在城市地区,生物质燃料已在家用能源中被更清洁的能源(如天然气和电力)广泛取代,但在大多数发展中国家,煤炭仍然是烹饪和取暖的主要燃料来源,特别是在冬季。此外,在城市地区,在家中或工作场所普遍接触环境烟草烟雾。有证据表明,农村地区的哮喘患病率和发病率低于城市地区。可能的原因是农村居民在生命早期就接触马厩和农场牛奶生产,这种接触可以预防哮喘发病率。即便如此,在城市贫困居民和农村人口中,哮喘发病率仍不成比例地高。非都会区成年居民的特点如下:年龄在 55 岁或以上、没有上过大学、家庭收入低、没有医疗保险覆盖、由于医疗保健服务的可用性等原因无法看医生。在农村地区,生物质燃料满足了 70%以上的农村能源需求。农村地区采用现代能源的进展缓慢。最直接的健康影响来自贫困家庭的家庭能源使用,他们几乎完全依赖于在通风不良的空间中使用简单烹饪设备燃烧生物质燃料。需要开展前瞻性研究来评估农村地区成年人长期暴露于生物质烟雾对肺部健康的影响。全世界的哮喘易感性存在地理差异。农村和城市地区哮喘发病率差异的原因可能是由于人口的生活方式和文化不同,以及不同的环境暴露和不同的遗传背景。确定哮喘住院治疗的地理差异对于实施预防策略、降低发病率和改善临床哮喘治疗的医疗保健融资至关重要。尽管有证据表明,在世界许多地区,包括发达国家,城市和农村居民的哮喘患病率存在差异,但数据不足以评估不同的污染物暴露在多大程度上导致了城市和农村地区的哮喘发病率和哮喘严重程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验