Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死再灌注治疗前大剂量给予尼可地尔的安全性和可行性。

Safety and feasibility of high-dose administration of nicorandil before reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Suematsu Yasunori, Murasato Yoshinobu, Miura Shin-Ichiro, Horiuchi Masataka, Yamamoto Tomohiko, Takata Kohei, Saku Keijiro

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Center, New Yukuhashi Hospital, Yukuhashi, Japan,

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Oct;28(4):352-61. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0182-z. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of high-dose nicorandil therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not yet been clarified. This is a prospective study including 30 patients who received nicorandil at 0.06 mg/kg/h [standard dose nicorandil (SDN) group] and 32 patients who received a bolus injection of nicorandil 0.2 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion at 0.2 mg/kg/h [high-dose nicorandil (HDN) group]. The benefits and adverse events were assessed during acute phase and 12-month follow-up period. There were no significant differences between the groups in blood pressure, heart rate or urine volume 2, 6 and 24 h after drug administration, although blood pressure decreased during acute phase. The percentages of patients who required dose reduction or discontinuation of nicorandil were 34.4 and 16.7 % in HDN and SDN groups, respectively (p = 0.11). In HDN group, subgroup analysis revealed that the TIMI frame count (TFC) was significantly lower in patients in whom the treatment was started within 12 h compared to those more than 12 h (17.0 vs. 21.0, p = 0.017) and in patients with baseline WBC elevation compared to those without it (16.5 vs. 22.0, p = 0.029). A TFC of >20 was significantly associated with being in HDN group [odds ratio (OR) 0.27; 95 % confidence interval, CI 0.07-0.89], onset-to-balloon time (OR 1.06; 95 % CI 1.01-1.16), and ∑creatine kinase (OR 7.27; 95 % CI 1.40-57.83). There were no significant differences in incidences of cardiovascular death, rehospitalization, and target lesion revascularization between the groups. HDN therapy may improve coronary microcirculation in patients with AMI.

摘要

大剂量尼可地尔治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的疗效和安全性尚未明确。这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了30例接受0.06mg/kg/h尼可地尔治疗的患者[标准剂量尼可地尔(SDN)组]和32例先静脉推注0.2mg/kg尼可地尔然后以0.2mg/kg/h持续输注的患者[大剂量尼可地尔(HDN)组]。在急性期和12个月随访期评估获益情况和不良事件。给药后2、6和24小时,两组间血压、心率或尿量无显著差异,尽管急性期血压有所下降。HDN组和SDN组中需要减少尼可地尔剂量或停药的患者百分比分别为34.4%和16.7%(p = 0.11)。在HDN组,亚组分析显示,与治疗开始时间超过12小时的患者相比,治疗开始时间在12小时内的患者心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)帧数(TFC)显著更低(17.(此处原文有误,应是17.0)vs. 21.0,p = 0.017),与基线白细胞升高的患者相比,无基线白细胞升高的患者TFC显著更低(16.5 vs. 22.0,p = 0.029)。TFC>20与HDN组显著相关[比值比(OR)0.27;95%置信区间(CI)0.07 - 0.89]、发病至球囊扩张时间(OR 1.06;95% CI 1.01 - 1.16)以及肌酸激酶总和(OR 7.27;95% CI 1.40 - 57.83)。两组间心血管死亡、再次住院和靶病变血管重建的发生率无显著差异。HDN治疗可能改善AMI患者的冠状动脉微循环。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验