Dowling Thomas C, Wang En-Shih, Ferrucci Luigi, Sorkin John D
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Sep;33(9):912-21. doi: 10.1002/phar.1282. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
To evaluate the performance of kidney function estimation equations and to determine the frequency of drug dose discordance in an older population.
Cross-sectional analysis of data from community-dwelling volunteers randomly selected from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010.
A total of 269 men and women with a mean ± SD age of 81 ± 6 years, mean serum creatinine concentration (Scr ) of 1.1 ± 0.4 mg/dl, and mean 24-hour measured creatinine clearance (mClcr ) of 53 ± 13 ml/minute.
Kidney function was estimated by using the following equations: Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). The performance of each equation was assessed by measuring bias and precision relative to mClcr . Dose calculation errors (discordance) were determined for 10 drugs requiring renal dosage adjustments to avoid toxicity when compared with the dosages approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The CG equation was the least biased estimate of mClcr . The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations were significantly positively biased compared with CG (mean ± SD 34 ± 20% and 22 ± 15%, respectively, p<0.001) and mClcr (29 ± 47% and 18 ± 40%, respectively, p<0.001). Rounding low Scr values (less than 1.0 mg/dl) up to an arbitrary value of 1.0 mg/dl resulted in CG values (44 ± 10 ml/minute) that were significantly lower than mClcr (56 ± 12 ml/minute, p<0.001) and CG (56 ± 15 ml/minute, p<0.001). The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations had median dose discordance rates of 28.6% and 22.9%, respectively.
The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations significantly overestimated creatinine clearance (mClcr and CG) in elderly individuals. This leads to dose calculation errors for many drugs, particularly in individuals with severe renal impairment. Thus equations estimating glomerular filtration rate should not be substituted in place of the CG equation in older adults for the purpose of renal dosage adjustments. In addition, the common practice of rounding or replacing low Scr values with an arbitrary value of 1.0 mg/dl for use in the CG equation should be avoided. Additional studies that evaluate alternative eGFR equations in the older populations that incorporate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes measures are needed.
评估肾功能估算方程的性能,并确定老年人群中药物剂量不一致的频率。
对2005年1月1日至2010年12月31日从巴尔的摩纵向衰老研究中随机选取的社区居住志愿者的数据进行横断面分析。
共有269名男性和女性,平均年龄±标准差为81±6岁,平均血清肌酐浓度(Scr)为1.1±0.4mg/dl,平均24小时测量的肌酐清除率(mClcr)为53±13ml/分钟。
使用以下方程估算肾功能:Cockcroft-Gault(CG)方程、肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)方程和慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程。通过测量相对于mClcr的偏差和精密度来评估每个方程的性能。与美国食品药品监督管理局批准的剂量相比,确定了10种需要调整肾脏剂量以避免毒性的药物的剂量计算误差(不一致性)。CG方程对mClcr的估计偏差最小。与CG方程相比,MDRD和CKD-EPI方程存在显著正偏差(分别为均值±标准差34±20%和22±15%,p<0.001),与mClcr相比也存在显著正偏差(分别为29±47%和18±40%,p<0.001)。将低Scr值(低于1.0mg/dl)向上舍入到任意值1.0mg/dl,导致CG值(44±10ml/分钟)显著低于mClcr(56±12ml/分钟,p<0.001)和CG(56±15ml/分钟,p<0.001)。MDRD和CKD-EPI方程的中位剂量不一致率分别为28.6%和22.9%。
MDRD和CKD-EPI方程显著高估了老年人的肌酐清除率(mClcr和CG)。这导致许多药物的剂量计算错误,尤其是在严重肾功能损害的个体中。因此,在老年人中进行肾脏剂量调整时,不应使用估算肾小球滤过率的方程替代CG方程。此外,应避免在CG方程中常规将低Scr值向上舍入或用任意值1.0mg/dl替代的做法。需要开展更多研究,在老年人群中评估纳入药代动力学和药效学结果指标的替代估算肾小球滤过率方程。