Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Aug;33(8):888-91. doi: 10.1002/phar.1285. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
In 2006, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) released a position statement and a white paper to provide the College's viewpoints on the importance of postgraduate pharmacy residency training as a prerequisite for direct patient care practice and the vision that future clinical pharmacists engaged in direct patient care would be certified by the Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS). Since the release of these papers, some members of the pharmacy profession have interpreted ACCP's position as maintaining that all pharmacists-regardless of the focus of their professional practice activities-should complete formal postgraduate residency training and be board-certified specialists. That interpretation is not accurate. In this commentary, ACCP further defines "direct patient care" and states that it believes that clinical pharmacists engaged in direct patient care should be board certified (i.e., and residency-trained or otherwise board eligible) and have established a valid collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement or have been formally granted clinical privileges. The rationale for this viewpoint is presented in detail. The pharmacy profession has appropriately invested substantial resources to ensure the quality of its accredited residency training programs and board certification processes. ACCP believes that these training and certification programs are essential steps in preparing clinical pharmacists to provide direct patient care.
2006 年,美国临床药学学院(ACCP)发布了一份立场声明和白皮书,阐述了学院对研究生药学住院医师培训作为直接患者护理实践的前提的重要性的观点,以及未来从事直接患者护理的临床药师将通过药学专业委员会(BPS)认证的愿景。自这些文件发布以来,一些药学专业人员将 ACCP 的立场解释为坚持认为所有药师——无论其专业实践活动的重点如何——都应完成正规的研究生住院医师培训并获得委员会认证的专家。这种解释并不准确。在这篇评论中,ACCP 进一步定义了“直接患者护理”,并表示它认为从事直接患者护理的临床药师应该获得委员会认证(即接受住院医师培训或其他委员会资格),并建立了有效的合作药物治疗管理(CDTM)协议或已正式获得临床权限。详细介绍了这一观点的基本原理。药学专业已经投入了大量资源来确保其认可的住院医师培训计划和委员会认证流程的质量。ACCP 认为,这些培训和认证计划是为临床药师提供直接患者护理做好准备的重要步骤。