Suppr超能文献

运用双重任务方法来区分人工语法学习中自动和非自动过程。

Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1491-500. doi: 10.1037/a0032974. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that both automatic and intentional processes contribute to the learning of grammar and fragment knowledge in artificial grammar learning (AGL) tasks. To explore the relative contribution of automatic and intentional processes to knowledge gained in AGL, we utilized dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic and intentional grammar- and fragment-based knowledge in AGL at both acquisition and at test. Both experiments used a balanced chunk strength grammar to assure an equal proportion of fragment cues (i.e., chunks) in grammatical and nongrammatical test items. In Experiment 1, participants engaged in a working memory dual-task either during acquisition, test, or both acquisition and test. The results showed that participants performing the dual-task during acquisition learned the artificial grammar as well as the single-task group, presumably by relying on automatic learning mechanisms. A working memory dual-task at test resulted in attenuated grammar performance, suggesting a role for intentional processes for the expression of grammatical learning at test. Experiment 2 explored the importance of perceptual cues by changing letters between the acquisition and test phase; unlike Experiment 1, there was no significant learning of grammatical information for participants under dual-task conditions in Experiment 2, suggesting that intentional processing is necessary for successful acquisition and expression of grammar-based knowledge under transfer conditions. In sum, it appears that some aspects of learning in AGL are indeed relatively automatic, although the expression of grammatical information and the learning of grammatical patterns when perceptual similarity is eliminated both appear to require explicit resources.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在人工语法学习(AGL)任务中,自动和有意过程都有助于语法和片段知识的学习。为了探究自动和有意过程对 AGL 中获得的知识的相对贡献,我们使用双重任务方法在获取和测试时将 AGL 中的自动和有意语法和基于片段的知识区分开来。两个实验都使用了平衡的块强度语法,以确保语法和非语法测试项目中具有相同比例的片段提示(即块)。在实验 1 中,参与者在获取、测试或获取和测试期间都进行了工作记忆双重任务。结果表明,在获取期间执行双重任务的参与者与单任务组一样学习了人工语法,可能是通过依赖自动学习机制。在测试期间进行工作记忆双重任务会导致语法表现减弱,这表明在测试时,有意过程对于语法学习的表达具有重要作用。实验 2 通过在获取和测试阶段之间改变字母来探究感知线索的重要性;与实验 1 不同,在实验 2 中,双重任务条件下的参与者没有显著学习语法信息,这表明在转移条件下,有意处理对于成功获取和表达基于语法的知识是必要的。总之,AGL 中的某些学习方面确实是相对自动的,尽管在感知相似性消除时,语法信息的表达和语法模式的学习都需要明确的资源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验