Bolas-Fernandez F, Wakelin D
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham.
Parasitology. 1990 Jun;100 Pt 3:491-7. doi: 10.1017/s003118200007880x.
Comparisons were made of the infectivity and antigenicity of 4 Trichinella spiralis isolates (S, D, Y, W), of quite different geographical origins, and T. pseudospiralis (P) in rapid- and slow-responder inbred mice. Infectivity was measured by the Index of Reproductive Capacity (ICR) expressed as the ratio between the number of muscle larvae recovered on day 30 post-infection (p.i.) and the numbers of larvae given at infection. Antigen recognition was measured by the degree of proliferation of mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC) to in vitro stimulation with crude muscle larvae antigen (CMLA) and by the total antibody responses to CMLA at day 25 p.i. as measured by ELISA. Regarding infectivity the isolates fell into two groups, high infectivity (S, D and Y) and low infectivity (W and P). Analysis of CMLA, detergent-stripped (CTAB) and 125I-labelled surface larval proteins was made by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Differences in antigen profiles were seen in all antigen preparations, being most noticeable in CTAB and 125I-labelled proteins from W and P isolates. Antigen recognition by polyclonal infection-derived antisera and by monoclonal antibodies raised against the T. spiralis London strain (L) was studied in the W (Arctic) and S (Spanish) isolates. Polyclonal antisera recognized different antigens in the S and W isolates, as did the monoclonal antibody, although recognition was more restricted. Neither antibody recognized a 64 kDa band in the W isolate which was clearly visible in the others tested.
比较了4株地理来源差异较大的旋毛虫(S、D、Y、W)和伪旋毛虫(P)在快速应答和慢速应答近交系小鼠中的感染性和抗原性。感染性通过生殖能力指数(ICR)来衡量,ICR表示为感染后30天回收的肌肉幼虫数量与感染时给予的幼虫数量之比。抗原识别通过肠系膜淋巴结细胞(MLNC)对粗制肌肉幼虫抗原(CMLA)体外刺激的增殖程度以及感染后25天通过ELISA测定的对CMLA的总抗体反应来衡量。关于感染性,这些分离株分为两组,高感染性(S、D和Y)和低感染性(W和P)。在还原条件下通过SDS-PAGE对CMLA、去污剂剥离(CTAB)和125I标记的表面幼虫蛋白进行分析。在所有抗原制剂中均观察到抗原谱的差异,在W和P分离株的CTAB和125I标记蛋白中最为明显。研究了W(北极)和S(西班牙)分离株中多克隆感染衍生抗血清以及针对旋毛虫伦敦株(L)产生的单克隆抗体的抗原识别情况。多克隆抗血清在S和W分离株中识别不同的抗原,单克隆抗体也是如此,尽管识别范围更窄。两种抗体在W分离株中均未识别出在其他测试株中清晰可见的64 kDa条带。