Department of Psychology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul;105(1):61-85. doi: 10.1037/a0032503. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
Close relationships fulfill many important needs. However, not all of these needs are equally salient under all circumstances. This article investigated how the broad motivational context in which people evaluate relationships affects the salience of particular needs, thereby altering how the fulfillment of these needs predicts relationship well-being. Across 5 studies, participants reported how well their current romantic relationship met their needs for self-direction and autonomy, either by providing support for the fulfillment of these needs (Studies 1-3) or by allowing them to feel that they autonomously choose to remain in the relationship (Studies 4 and 5). In motivational contexts emphasizing personal growth and advancement (promotion), one's own independent priorities could become more salient, increasing the relevance of autonomy experiences when evaluating relationship well-being. However, in motivational contexts emphasizing safety and security (prevention), autonomy experiences might not be especially salient and thus might not have any special relevance when evaluating relationship well-being. Both measurements and manipulations of participants' motivations for growth or security consistently supported these hypotheses.
亲密关系可以满足许多重要的需求。然而,并非所有这些需求在所有情况下都同样突出。本文探讨了人们评估关系时的广泛动机背景如何影响特定需求的突出程度,从而改变这些需求的满足程度如何预测关系幸福感。在 5 项研究中,参与者报告了他们当前的浪漫关系在多大程度上满足了他们对自我指导和自主性的需求,要么通过提供满足这些需求的支持(研究 1-3),要么让他们感到自己自主选择留在关系中(研究 4 和 5)。在强调个人成长和进步(促进)的动机背景下,自己的独立优先事项可能会变得更加突出,从而在评估关系幸福感时增加自主性体验的相关性。然而,在强调安全和保障(预防)的动机背景下,自主性体验可能并不特别突出,因此在评估关系幸福感时可能没有特殊意义。对参与者成长或安全动机的测量和操作都一致支持了这些假设。