Suppr超能文献

血糖控制与共享电子病历中安全的医患信息交流相关:一项纵向分析。

Glycemic control associated with secure patient-provider messaging within a shared electronic medical record: a longitudinal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2726-33. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2003. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study differences in glycemic control and HbA1c testing associated with use of secure electronic patient-provider messaging. We hypothesized that messaging use would be associated with better glycemic control and a higher rate of adherence to HbA1c testing recommendations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study of secure messaging at Group Health, a large nonprofit health care system. Our analysis included adults with diabetes who had registered for access to a shared electronic medical record (SMR) between 2003 and 2006. We fit log-linear regression models, using generalized estimating equations, to estimate the adjusted rate ratio of meeting three indicators of glycemic control (HbA1c <7%, HbA1c <8%, and HbA1c >9%) and HbA1c testing adherence by level of previous messaging use. Multiple imputation and inverse probability weights were used to account for missing data.

RESULTS

During the study period, 6,301 adults with diabetes registered for access to the SMR. Of these individuals, 74% used messaging at least once during that time. Frequent use of messaging during the previous calendar quarter was associated with a higher rate of good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%: rate ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.15-1.37]) and a higher rate testing adherence (1.20 [1.15-1.25]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among SMR users, recent and frequent messaging use was associated with better glycemic control and a higher rate of HbA1c testing adherence. These results suggest that secure messaging may facilitate important processes of care and help some patients to achieve or maintain adequate glycemic control.

摘要

目的

研究使用安全的电子医患通信与血糖控制和 HbA1c 检测之间的差异。我们假设,使用消息传递将与更好的血糖控制和更高的 HbA1c 检测建议依从率相关。

研究设计和方法

这是一项对 Group Health 使用安全消息传递的回顾性观察性研究,该机构是一个大型非营利性医疗保健系统。我们的分析包括 2003 年至 2006 年间注册访问共享电子病历(SMR)的糖尿病成年人。我们使用广义估计方程拟合对数线性回归模型,以估计符合三项血糖控制指标(HbA1c <7%、HbA1c <8%和 HbA1c >9%)和 HbA1c 检测依从性的调整率比,该指标按先前消息传递使用水平进行分层。我们使用多重插补和逆概率权重来处理缺失数据。

结果

在研究期间,6301 名糖尿病成年人注册访问 SMR。其中,74%的人在此期间至少使用过一次消息传递。上一个日历季度频繁使用消息传递与更好的血糖控制率相关(HbA1c <7%:率比,1.26[95%CI,1.15-1.37])和更高的 HbA1c 检测依从率(1.20[1.15-1.25])。

结论

在 SMR 用户中,最近和频繁的消息传递使用与更好的血糖控制和更高的 HbA1c 检测依从率相关。这些结果表明,安全消息传递可能有助于促进重要的护理流程,并帮助一些患者实现或维持足够的血糖控制。

相似文献

6
Can Secure Patient-Provider Messaging Improve Diabetes Care?安全的医患信息沟通能否改善糖尿病护理?
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1342-1348. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0140. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.执行摘要:2012年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-S10. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s004.
4
Depression, glycemic control and type 2 diabetes.抑郁、血糖控制与 2 型糖尿病。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2011 Oct 7;3(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-3-26.
9
Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study.在线糖尿病自我管理项目:一项随机研究。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275-81. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2153. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验