Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2726-33. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2003. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
To study differences in glycemic control and HbA1c testing associated with use of secure electronic patient-provider messaging. We hypothesized that messaging use would be associated with better glycemic control and a higher rate of adherence to HbA1c testing recommendations.
Retrospective observational study of secure messaging at Group Health, a large nonprofit health care system. Our analysis included adults with diabetes who had registered for access to a shared electronic medical record (SMR) between 2003 and 2006. We fit log-linear regression models, using generalized estimating equations, to estimate the adjusted rate ratio of meeting three indicators of glycemic control (HbA1c <7%, HbA1c <8%, and HbA1c >9%) and HbA1c testing adherence by level of previous messaging use. Multiple imputation and inverse probability weights were used to account for missing data.
During the study period, 6,301 adults with diabetes registered for access to the SMR. Of these individuals, 74% used messaging at least once during that time. Frequent use of messaging during the previous calendar quarter was associated with a higher rate of good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%: rate ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.15-1.37]) and a higher rate testing adherence (1.20 [1.15-1.25]).
Among SMR users, recent and frequent messaging use was associated with better glycemic control and a higher rate of HbA1c testing adherence. These results suggest that secure messaging may facilitate important processes of care and help some patients to achieve or maintain adequate glycemic control.
研究使用安全的电子医患通信与血糖控制和 HbA1c 检测之间的差异。我们假设,使用消息传递将与更好的血糖控制和更高的 HbA1c 检测建议依从率相关。
这是一项对 Group Health 使用安全消息传递的回顾性观察性研究,该机构是一个大型非营利性医疗保健系统。我们的分析包括 2003 年至 2006 年间注册访问共享电子病历(SMR)的糖尿病成年人。我们使用广义估计方程拟合对数线性回归模型,以估计符合三项血糖控制指标(HbA1c <7%、HbA1c <8%和 HbA1c >9%)和 HbA1c 检测依从性的调整率比,该指标按先前消息传递使用水平进行分层。我们使用多重插补和逆概率权重来处理缺失数据。
在研究期间,6301 名糖尿病成年人注册访问 SMR。其中,74%的人在此期间至少使用过一次消息传递。上一个日历季度频繁使用消息传递与更好的血糖控制率相关(HbA1c <7%:率比,1.26[95%CI,1.15-1.37])和更高的 HbA1c 检测依从率(1.20[1.15-1.25])。
在 SMR 用户中,最近和频繁的消息传递使用与更好的血糖控制和更高的 HbA1c 检测依从率相关。这些结果表明,安全消息传递可能有助于促进重要的护理流程,并帮助一些患者实现或维持足够的血糖控制。