Nambi S Gopal
C.U. Shah College of Physiotherapy, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):149-53. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00359.
The most common instruments developed to assess the functional status of patients with Non specific low back pain is the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Clinical and epidemiological research related to low back pain in the Gujarati population would be facilitated by the availability of well-established outcome measures.
To find the reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity of the Gujarati version of the RMDQ for use in Non Specific Chronic low back pain.
A reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity study of Gujarati version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
Thirty out patients with Non Specific Chronic low back pain were assessed by the RMDQ. Reliability is assessed by using internal consistency and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal construct validity is assessed by RASCH Analysis and external construct validity is assessed by association with pain and spinal movement. Clinical calculator was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity.
Internal consistency of the RMDQ is found to be adequate (> 0.65) at both times, with high ICC's also at both time points. Internal construct validity of the scale is good, indicating a single underlying construct. Expected associations with pain and spinal movement confirm external construct validity. The Sensitivity and Specificity at cut off point of 0.5 was 80% and 84% with respectively positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.33% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 80.76%. The Questionnaire is at the ordinal level.
The RMDQ is a one-dimensional, ordinal measure, which works well in the Gujarati population.
用于评估非特异性下腰痛患者功能状态的最常用工具是罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)。成熟的结局指标将有助于古吉拉特人群中与下腰痛相关的临床和流行病学研究。
确定古吉拉特语版RMDQ在非特异性慢性下腰痛中的信度、效度、敏感性和特异性。
古吉拉特语版罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)的信度、效度、敏感性和特异性研究。
采用RMDQ对30例非特异性慢性下腰痛门诊患者进行评估。通过内部一致性和组内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。通过Rasch分析评估内部结构效度,通过与疼痛和脊柱活动的相关性评估外部结构效度。使用临床计算器确定敏感性和特异性。
RMDQ在两个时间点的内部一致性均足够(>0.65),两个时间点的ICC也都很高。该量表的内部结构效度良好,表明存在单一潜在结构。与疼痛和脊柱活动的预期关联证实了外部结构效度。截断点为0.5时,敏感性和特异性分别为80%和84%,阳性预测值(PPV)为83.33%,阴性预测值(NPV)为80.76%。该问卷属于有序水平。
RMDQ是一种一维有序测量工具,在古吉拉特人群中效果良好。