Abad-Gómez José M, Gutiérrez Jorge S, Villegas Auxiliadora, Sánchez-Guzmán Juan M, Navedo Juan G, Masero José A
Conservation Biology Research Group, Zoology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2013 May-Jun;86(3):354-60. doi: 10.1086/670733. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
Despite host defense against parasites and pathogens being considered a costly life-history trait, relatively few studies have assessed the energetic cost of immune responsiveness. Knowledge of such energetic costs may help to understand the mechanisms by which trade-offs with other demanding activities occur. The time course and associated metabolic costs of mounting a primary and secondary humoral immune response was examined in little ringed plovers Charadrius dubius challenged with sheep red blood cells. As was expected, the injection with this antigen increased the production of specific antibodies significantly, with peaks 6 d postinjection in both primary and secondary responses. At the peak of secondary antibody response, the antibody production was 29% higher than that observed during the primary response, but the difference was nonsignificant. Mounting the primary response did not significantly increase the resting metabolic rate (RMR) of birds, whereas the secondary response did by 21%, suggesting that the latter was more costly in terms of RMR. In spite of the fact that the primary response did not involve an increase in RMR, birds significantly decreased their body mass. This could imply an internal energy reallocation strategy to cope with the induced immune challenge. Last, we found that RMR and antibody production peaks were not coupled, which could help to conciliate the variable results of previous studies. Collectively, the results of this study support the hypothesis that humoral immunity, especially the secondary response, entails energetic costs that may trade-off with other physiological activities.
尽管宿主抵御寄生虫和病原体被认为是一种代价高昂的生活史特征,但相对较少的研究评估了免疫反应的能量消耗。了解这种能量消耗可能有助于理解与其他高需求活动进行权衡的机制。在受到绵羊红细胞挑战的小嘴鸻中,研究了产生初次和二次体液免疫反应的时间进程及相关代谢成本。正如预期的那样,注射这种抗原显著增加了特异性抗体的产生,在初次和二次反应中,注射后6天达到峰值。在二次抗体反应的峰值时,抗体产生量比初次反应期间观察到的高出29%,但差异不显著。产生初次反应并没有显著提高鸟类的静息代谢率(RMR),而二次反应使其提高了21%,这表明就RMR而言,后者的成本更高。尽管初次反应并未导致RMR增加,但鸟类的体重显著下降。这可能意味着一种内部能量重新分配策略来应对诱导的免疫挑战。最后,我们发现RMR和抗体产生峰值没有关联,这有助于调和先前研究的不同结果。总体而言,本研究结果支持以下假设:体液免疫,尤其是二次反应,需要能量成本,这可能会与其他生理活动进行权衡。