O'Shea Thomas J, Bowen Richard A, Stanley Thomas R, Shankar Vidya, Rupprecht Charles E
United States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086261. eCollection 2014.
In 2001-2005 we sampled permanently marked big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) at summer roosts in buildings at Fort Collins, Colorado, for rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA). Seroprevalence was higher in adult females (17.9%, n = 2,332) than males (9.4%, n = 128; P = 0.007) or volant juveniles (10.2%, n = 738; P<0.0001). Seroprevalence was lowest in a drought year with local insecticide use and highest in the year with normal conditions, suggesting that environmental stress may suppress RVNA production in big brown bats. Seroprevalence also increased with age of bat, and varied from 6.2 to 26.7% among adult females at five roosts sampled each year for five years. Seroprevalence of adult females at 17 other roosts sampled for 1 to 4 years ranged from 0.0 to 47.1%. Using logistic regression, the only ranking model in our candidate set of explanatory variables for serological status at first sampling included year, day of season, and a year by day of season interaction that varied with relative drought conditions. The presence or absence of antibodies in individual bats showed temporal variability. Year alone provided the best model to explain the likelihood of adult female bats showing a transition to seronegative from a previously seropositive state. Day of the season was the only competitive model to explain the likelihood of a transition from seronegative to seropositive, which increased as the season progressed. We found no rabies viral RNA in oropharyngeal secretions of 261 seropositive bats or in organs of 13 euthanized seropositive bats. Survival of seropositive and seronegative bats did not differ. The presence of RVNA in serum of bats should not be interpreted as evidence for ongoing rabies infection.
2001年至2005年期间,我们在科罗拉多州柯林斯堡建筑物中的夏季栖息地对永久标记的大棕蝠(棕蝠)进行采样,检测其狂犬病病毒中和抗体(RVNA)。成年雌性的血清阳性率(17.9%,n = 2332)高于雄性(9.4%,n = 128;P = 0.007)或飞行中的幼崽(10.2%,n = 738;P<0.0001)。在当地使用杀虫剂的干旱年份血清阳性率最低,在正常条件年份最高,这表明环境压力可能会抑制大棕蝠的RVNA产生。血清阳性率也随蝙蝠年龄增加,在连续五年每年采样的五个栖息地中,成年雌性的血清阳性率在6.2%至26.7%之间变化。在其他17个栖息地采样1至4年的成年雌性血清阳性率在0.0%至47.1%之间。使用逻辑回归,在我们用于首次采样时血清学状态的候选解释变量集中,唯一的排名模型包括年份、季节日以及随相对干旱条件变化的年份与季节日的相互作用。个体蝙蝠抗体的存在与否呈现出时间变异性。仅年份就能提供最佳模型来解释成年雌性蝙蝠从先前血清阳性状态转变为血清阴性的可能性。季节日是解释从血清阴性转变为血清阳性可能性的唯一有竞争力的模型,这种可能性随着季节推进而增加。我们在261只血清阳性蝙蝠的口咽分泌物或13只安乐死的血清阳性蝙蝠的器官中未发现狂犬病病毒RNA。血清阳性和血清阴性蝙蝠的存活率没有差异。蝙蝠血清中RVNA的存在不应被解释为正在发生狂犬病感染的证据。