冠状动脉造影：是时候重新评估了吗？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Coronary angiography: is it time to reassess?

作者信息

Anderson R David, Pepine Carl J

出版信息

Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1760-2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002566.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002566

PMID:23630085

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3746971/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fb4/3746971/69a3ebd51c1d/nihms-476055-f0001.jpg

相似文献

Coronary angiography: is it time to reassess?冠状动脉造影：是时候重新评估了吗？

Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1760-2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002566.

Letter by Kern regarding article, "comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the assessing angiography (A2) project".克恩就文章《当代实践中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床解读与视觉评估及定量冠状动脉造影的比较：评估血管造影（A2）项目》所写的信。

Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):e461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002591.

Letter by Khandelwal regarding article, "comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the assessing angiography (A2) project".坎德尔瓦尔就文章《当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床解读与视觉评估及定量冠状动脉造影的比较：评估血管造影（A2）项目》所写的信。

Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):e462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004145.

Response to letters regarding article, "comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the assessing angiography (A2) project".对关于文章《当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床解读与视觉评估及定量冠状动脉造影的比较：评估血管造影（A2）项目》的信件的回复

Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):e463-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005507.

Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the Assessing Angiography (A2) project.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床解读与视觉评估和定量冠状动脉造影：评估造影（A2）项目。

Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1793-800. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Paradigm has already shifted to ischemia-guided functional approach.范式已转向缺血引导的功能方法。

Circulation. 2013 Jul 9;128(2):95-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003895. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Predictive value of coronary CT angiography for side-branch occlusion.冠状动脉CT血管造影对分支闭塞的预测价值。

Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):306-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141681.

Response to letter regarding article, "Quantification of incomplete revascularization and its association with five-year mortality in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial: validation of the residual SYNTAX Score".对关于文章《紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏外科手术协同治疗（SYNTAX）试验中不完全血运重建的量化及其与五年死亡率的关联：残余SYNTAX评分的验证》的信件的回复

Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):e355-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008026.

Letter by Carnero-Alcazar et al regarding article, "Quantification of incomplete revascularization and its association with five-year mortality in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial: validation of the residual SYNTAX Score".卡内罗 - 阿尔卡萨等人就文章《经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术协同作用（SYNTAX）试验中不完全血运重建的量化及其与五年死亡率的关联：残余SYNTAX评分的验证》所写的信函

Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):e354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005773.

Response.反应

Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):307. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14144043.

引用本文的文献

Differences in severity of diffuse and focal coronary stenosis between visual and quantitative assessment.视觉评估与定量评估在弥漫性和局灶性冠状动脉狭窄严重程度上的差异。

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 16;11:1501576. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1501576. eCollection 2024.

Evaluation of stenoses using AI video models applied to coronary angiography.使用应用于冠状动脉造影的人工智能视频模型评估狭窄情况。

NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 23;7(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01134-4.

Resonance-Based Microwave Technique for Body Implant Sensing.基于共振的微波技术在体植介入感知中的应用

Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;19(22):4828. doi: 10.3390/s19224828.

The natural course of nonculprit coronary artery lesions; analysis by serial quantitative coronary angiography.非罪犯冠状动脉病变的自然病程；通过系列定量冠状动脉造影进行分析。

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0870-9.

In-hospital and long-term mortality in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a community hospital experience.Takotsubo心肌病的院内及长期死亡率：一家社区医院的经验

J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016 Jul 6;6(3):31082. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.31082. eCollection 2016.

Missense variants in CFTR nucleotide-binding domains predict quantitative phenotypes associated with cystic fibrosis disease severity.囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子核苷酸结合结构域中的错义变体可预测与囊性纤维化疾病严重程度相关的定量表型。

Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Apr 1;24(7):1908-17. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu607. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1793-800. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.临界血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠心病的药物治疗。

N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.在 FAME 研究中，血管造影与功能严重程度评估冠状动脉狭窄：血流储备分数与多血管造影比较。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.血流储备分数与血管造影术在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.

American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.美国心脏病学会/欧洲心脏病学会血管造影数据压缩国际研究第二阶段：不同JPEG数据压缩级别对数字冠状动脉造影中狭窄程度定量评估的影响。联合图像专家组。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Apr;35(5):1380-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00611-7.

American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography.美国心脏病学会/欧洲心脏病学会血管造影数据压缩国际研究第一阶段：有损数据压缩对数字冠状动脉造影诊断特征识别的影响。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Apr;35(5):1370-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00610-5.

Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis.心肌血流量与冠状动脉狭窄严重程度之间的关系。

N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1782-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302503.

Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators.视觉、卡尺测量和计算机方法评估的冠状动脉狭窄与单支冠状动脉疾病患者运动能力之间的关系。退伍军人事务部ACME研究人员。

Circulation. 1994 May;89(5):2005-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2005.

Hemodynamics of multiple versus single 50 percent coronary arterial stenoses.多处50%冠状动脉狭窄与单处50%冠状动脉狭窄的血流动力学

Am J Cardiol. 1982 Aug;50(2):276-80. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90177-1.

Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard".冠状动脉狭窄直径百分比的视觉估计：“一个受损害的金标准”

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Apr;11(4):882-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90226-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验