• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估糖尿病患者和医护人员对一种具有记忆功能的新型耐用胰岛素笔的偏好。

Evaluation of preference for a novel durable insulin pen with memory function among patients with diabetes and health care professionals.

作者信息

Klausmann Gerhard, Hramiak Irene, Qvist Marianne, Mikkelsen Kristian Handberg, Guo Xiaohui

机构信息

Internal Medicine Diabetology Practice, Aschaffenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Apr 5;7:285-92. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S41929. Print 2013.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S41929
PMID:23630416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3623548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving adherence to insulin treatment for better glycemic control remains a challenge in the management of diabetes. New technological aids are required to help support adherence. This study evaluated preference for the NovoPen(®) 5 (NP5), a durable insulin pen with memory function, compared with the HumaPen Luxura(®) (HPL) among patients with diabetes and health care professionals.

METHODS

This crossover, multicenter usability study included insulin pen-experienced patients with diabetes and health care professionals treating patients with diabetes in Canada, China, and Germany. Participants evaluated NP5 and HPL in a randomized order by performing handling tasks in a usability test related to everyday use during a face-to-face interview. Tasks, pens, and preferences were assessed by completing a questionnaire comprised of rating and open-ended questions relating to confidence in everyday diabetes management.

RESULTS

Overall, 300 patients with diabetes and 150 health care professionals participated in the study. Significantly more participants preferred NP5 (81%) to HPL (18%) (P < 0.001). Also, 82% of patients with diabetes had more confidence in NP5 for managing their daily injections versus 11% with HPL (P < 0.001), and 7% had no preference. Memory function was most helpful in giving patients with diabetes confidence about when they last injected (63%), how much insulin they last injected (62%) and improving diabetes management (55%). Participants gave higher ratings to NP5 than to HPL on all parameters relating to performing an injection (ease of handling, satisfaction when using the pen, convenience of using the pen day-to-day, quality of the pen, and the extent to which the pen meets their needs; P < 0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

NP5 was preferred to HPL by most participants. Significantly more patients with diabetes had more confidence for managing daily insulin injections when using NP5, the pen with a memory function.

摘要

背景

在糖尿病管理中,提高胰岛素治疗依从性以实现更好的血糖控制仍是一项挑战。需要新的技术辅助手段来支持依从性。本研究评估了糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员对诺和笔5(NP5)(一种具有记忆功能的耐用胰岛素笔)与优伴笔(HPL)的偏好。

方法

这项交叉、多中心可用性研究纳入了加拿大、中国和德国有胰岛素笔使用经验的糖尿病患者以及治疗糖尿病患者的医疗保健专业人员。参与者通过在面对面访谈中进行与日常使用相关的可用性测试中的操作任务,以随机顺序评估NP5和HPL。通过完成一份由与日常糖尿病管理信心相关的评分和开放式问题组成的问卷来评估任务、笔和偏好。

结果

总体而言,300名糖尿病患者和150名医疗保健专业人员参与了研究。明显更多的参与者更喜欢NP5(81%)而非HPL(18%)(P < 0.001)。此外,82%的糖尿病患者对NP5管理每日注射更有信心,而对HPL有信心的为11%(P < 0.001),7%没有偏好。记忆功能在让糖尿病患者对上次注射时间(63%)、上次注射的胰岛素量(62%)以及改善糖尿病管理(55%)方面最有帮助。在与注射相关的所有参数(操作便利性、使用笔时的满意度、日常使用笔的便利性、笔的质量以及笔满足其需求的程度)上,参与者对NP5的评分高于HPL(所有比较P < 0.05)。

结论

大多数参与者更喜欢NP5而非HPL。明显更多的糖尿病患者在使用具有记忆功能的NP5笔进行每日胰岛素注射管理时更有信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/3623548/74c046f133ca/ppa-7-285f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/3623548/04c8dfff9090/ppa-7-285f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/3623548/74c046f133ca/ppa-7-285f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/3623548/04c8dfff9090/ppa-7-285f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/3623548/74c046f133ca/ppa-7-285f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of preference for a novel durable insulin pen with memory function among patients with diabetes and health care professionals.评估糖尿病患者和医护人员对一种具有记忆功能的新型耐用胰岛素笔的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Apr 5;7:285-92. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S41929. Print 2013.
2
Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.新型耐用胰岛素笔的记忆功能在糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员中的评估。
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012 Apr;9(4):355-6. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2012.671808.
3
Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals.用于胰岛素注射的诺和笔Echo®:儿科患者、其父母及医护人员对其易用性、功能性和偏好的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1468-75. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400622.
4
A randomized, cross-over comparison of preference between two reusable insulin pen devices in pen-naïve adults with diabetes.一项在糖尿病初用胰岛素笔的成人中进行的两种可重复使用胰岛素笔装置之间偏好的随机、交叉比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 May;29(5):465-73. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.779576. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
5
No effect of insulin pen with memory function on glycemic control in a patient cohort with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomized open-label study.具有记忆功能的胰岛素笔对1型糖尿病控制不佳患者队列血糖控制无影响:一项随机开放标签研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 1;6(6):1392-7. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600619.
6
A randomized, open-label, comparative crossover handling trial between two durable pens in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.一项针对1型或2型糖尿病患者的两种耐用笔之间的随机、开放标签、比较交叉操作试验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Sep 1;5(5):1212-21. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500529.
7
Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.新型预填充胰岛素笔注射装置的易用性和偏好评价:糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):2043-52. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.616190. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
A review of 25 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin pens in the management of diabetes mellitus.回顾诺和笔家族胰岛素笔 25 年用于糖尿病管理的经验。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(10):643-74. doi: 10.2165/11584360-000000000-00000.
9
Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.新型一次性胰岛素笔Solostar与Flexpen、礼来一次性笔及一种原型笔的可用性和患者偏好比较:一项开放标签研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):650-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.003.
10
Assessment for ease of use and preference of a new prefilled insulin pen (FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200) versus the SoloSTAR insulin pen by patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals.评估新型预填充胰岛素笔(FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200)在糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员中的易用性和偏好性,与 SoloSTAR 胰岛素笔相比。
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 Sep;11(9):1381-9. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.927438. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Telemedicine Using Smart Insulin Pens with Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Telecommunication Systems: A Case Series.使用带有连续血糖监测和电信系统的智能胰岛素笔推进远程医疗:病例系列
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 7;14(6):1794. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061794.
2
Development of an Insulin Pen is a Patient-Centric Multidisciplinary Undertaking: A Commentary.胰岛素笔的研发是一项以患者为中心的多学科工作:述评。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):617-622. doi: 10.1177/19322968211058707. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Efficacy of a Smart Insulin Pen Cap for the Management of Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.新型耐用胰岛素笔的记忆功能在糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员中的评估。
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012 Apr;9(4):355-6. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2012.671808.
2
Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study.在多国胰岛素治疗患者和医生全球态度研究中胰岛素依从行为及其障碍。
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):682-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03605.x.
3
Insulin therapy for diabetes mellitus: treatment regimens and associated costs.
智能胰岛素笔帽管理未控制 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项随机交叉试验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):201-207. doi: 10.1177/19322968211033837. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Digital Diabetes Management: A Literature Review of Smart Insulin Pens.数字糖尿病管理:智能胰岛素笔的文献综述。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):587-595. doi: 10.1177/1932296820983863. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch.患者对进餐时胰岛素递送贴片的认知与偏好。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0365-1. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Half-Unit Insulin Pens: Disease Management in Patients With Diabetes Who Are Sensitive to Insulin.半单位胰岛素笔:对胰岛素敏感的糖尿病患者的疾病管理
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):623-630. doi: 10.1177/1932296816679180. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
The Relationship between Cognitive Appraisal and Adherence to Medical Regimens in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.2型糖尿病患者认知评估与药物治疗依从性之间的关系
J Caring Sci. 2014 Dec 1;3(4):277-85. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.030. eCollection 2014 Dec.
8
Biosimilar insulins: a European perspective.生物类似物胰岛素:欧洲视角
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 May;17(5):445-51. doi: 10.1111/dom.12410. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.评估糖尿病自我管理行为依从性时技术的应用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9):521. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0521-1.
10
The effect of medical device dose-memory functions on patients' adherence to treatment, confidence, and disease self-management.医疗设备剂量记忆功能对患者治疗依从性、信心及疾病自我管理的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 23;8:775-88. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S61248. eCollection 2014.
糖尿病的胰岛素治疗:治疗方案及相关费用。
Diabetes Metab. 2012 Apr;38(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
4
IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集:2011 年和 2030 年全球糖尿病患病率估计。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;94(3):311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
5
Barriers to effective insulin treatment: the persistence of poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.胰岛素治疗效果不佳的障碍:2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制仍不理想。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Nov;27 Suppl 3:13-20. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.621416. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Hypoglycemia: an overview of fear of hypoglycemia, quality-of-life, and impact on costs.低血糖:对低血糖恐惧、生活质量的概述,以及对成本的影响。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):646-55. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.610852. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
7
Compatibility testing of two types of pen needles with a range of injection pens for diabetes medication.两种类型的胰岛素注射笔用针头与一系列糖尿病药物注射笔的兼容性测试。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Mar;27(3):589-92. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.547574. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals.用于胰岛素注射的诺和笔Echo®:儿科患者、其父母及医护人员对其易用性、功能性和偏好的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1468-75. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400622.
9
Health economics and compliance of vials/syringes versus pen devices: a review of the evidence.瓶/注射器与笔式装置的健康经济学和合规性:证据回顾。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Jun;12 Suppl 1:S101-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0180.
10
Assessment of adherence and healthcare costs of insulin device (FlexPen) versus conventional vial/syringe.胰岛素装置(FlexPen)与传统瓶/注射器的依从性和医疗成本评估。
Adv Ther. 2010 Feb;27(2):94-104. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0009-6. Epub 2010 Mar 26.