Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Aug;72(3):352-61. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113001237. Epub 2013 May 1.
Although robust associations between dietary intake and population health are evident from conventional observational epidemiology, the outcomes of large-scale intervention studies testing the causality of those links have often proved inconclusive or have failed to demonstrate causality. This apparent conflict may be due to the well-recognised difficulty in measuring habitual food intake which may lead to confounding in observational epidemiology. Urine biomarkers indicative of exposure to specific foods offer information supplementary to the reliance on dietary intake self-assessment tools, such as FFQ, which are subject to individual bias. Biomarker discovery strategies using non-targeted metabolomics have been used recently to analyse urine from either short-term food intervention studies or from cohort studies in which participants consumed a freely-chosen diet. In the latter, the analysis of diet diary or FFQ information allowed classification of individuals in terms of the frequency of consumption of specific diet constituents. We review these approaches for biomarker discovery and illustrate both with particular reference to two studies carried out by the authors using approaches combining metabolite fingerprinting by MS with supervised multivariate data analysis. In both approaches, urine signals responsible for distinguishing between specific foods were identified and could be related to the chemical composition of the original foods. When using dietary data, both food distinctiveness and consumption frequency influenced whether differential dietary exposure could be discriminated adequately. We conclude that metabolomics methods for fingerprinting or profiling of overnight void urine, in particular, provide a robust strategy for dietary exposure biomarker-lead discovery.
虽然常规观察性流行病学明显表明饮食摄入与人群健康之间存在密切关联,但大规模干预研究测试这些关联因果关系的结果往往并不明确,或者未能证明因果关系。这种明显的冲突可能是由于众所周知的难以衡量习惯性食物摄入,这可能导致观察性流行病学中的混杂。尿液生物标志物可指示特定食物的暴露情况,为依赖饮食摄入自我评估工具(如 FFQ)提供了补充信息,因为这些工具可能受到个体偏差的影响。最近,使用非靶向代谢组学的生物标志物发现策略已被用于分析短期食物干预研究或参与者自由选择饮食的队列研究中的尿液。在后一种情况下,通过饮食日记或 FFQ 信息的分析,可以根据特定饮食成分的消费频率对个体进行分类。我们回顾了这些生物标志物发现方法,并举例说明了这两种方法,这些方法结合了通过 MS 进行代谢产物指纹图谱分析和有监督的多变量数据分析。在这两种方法中,都鉴定出了能够区分特定食物的尿液信号,并且可以与原始食物的化学成分相关联。在使用饮食数据时,食物的独特性和消费频率都会影响是否能够充分区分不同的饮食暴露。我们得出结论,用于过夜尿液指纹图谱或图谱分析的代谢组学方法特别为饮食暴露生物标志物发现提供了一种稳健的策略。