Lenler-Petersen P, Jorn L P
Randers Centralsygehus, anaestesiologisk afdeling.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Jun 4;152(23):1662-4.
An investigation was performed to compare the Animec infusion warmer with the Fenwall infusion warmer. The maximal increase in temperature for the Animec infusion warmer was 8.9 degrees C and this was recorded with a flow of 395 ml/hour. The values for the Fenwall infusion warmer were 12.0 degrees C with a flow of 1,527 ml/hour. An estimate is made of the reduced energy deficit with employment of the two infusion warmers. It is concluded that supply of energy to the infusion warmers. It is concluded that supply of energy to the infusion fluid depends on the flow of fluid through the infusion warmer and the capacity of the infusion warmer. Great differences were observed in the capacities of the two infusion warmers to compensate for the peroperative energy deficit at the rates of flow normally recommended.
进行了一项调查,以比较阿尼梅克输液加温器和芬沃尔输液加温器。阿尼梅克输液加温器的最大温度升高为8.9摄氏度,这是在流速为395毫升/小时时记录的。芬沃尔输液加温器在流速为1527毫升/小时时的温度升高值为12.0摄氏度。对使用这两种输液加温器减少的能量不足进行了估计。得出的结论是,向输液加温器供应能量。得出的结论是,向输液液体供应能量取决于通过输液加温器的液体流速和输液加温器的容量。在通常推荐的流速下,观察到两种输液加温器在补偿手术期间能量不足的能力上存在很大差异。