• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲国家的人群获得新疫苗的途径。

Population access to new vaccines in European countries.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2013 Jun 12;31(27):2862-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.039
PMID:23632307
Abstract

Time from registration to population access to new vaccines can take considerable time in European countries. Reasons might be found in the regulatory framework, decision-making processes or the assessment of vaccines by evaluating bodies. The aim of this study was to determine whether some decision-making processes can explain between-country differences in the time to population access to new vaccination programs. Information gathered from a survey among European National Vaccine Industry Groups was combined with information from official health authorities, vaccine manufacturers and literature published. Firstly, a retrospective survey was conducted to measure access time to new vaccines against three diseases in 17 European countries. Secondly, qualitative information on the country-specific decision-making frameworks for the introduction of new "vaccination programs" was identified in a cross-sectional survey. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were used for data analysis. The median access time to new vaccines was 6.4 years (95% confidence interval: 5.7-7.1 years) post marketing authorization. National assessments underlying immunization policy decisions (recommendation phase) absorbed most of the access time. Correlation analysis suggested that processes with established timelines and clarity in regard to vaccine evaluation criteria used could ameliorate the effectiveness of the decision-making process. In order to reduce the time to access for new, beneficial vaccines, the underlying vaccination recommendation, implementation and funding process needs to be understood and optimized, where necessary.

摘要

从注册到新疫苗供民众使用的时间在欧洲国家可能需要相当长的时间。原因可能在于监管框架、决策过程或评估机构对疫苗的评估。本研究旨在确定某些决策过程是否可以解释国家间新疫苗接种计划获得民众使用的时间差异。从欧洲国家疫苗产业集团的一项调查中收集的信息与来自官方卫生当局、疫苗制造商和已发表文献的信息相结合。首先,进行了一项回顾性调查,以衡量 17 个欧洲国家获得三种疾病新疫苗的时间。其次,在横断面调查中确定了各国新“疫苗接种计划”引入的具体决策框架的定性信息。采用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(ρ)进行数据分析。上市许可后获得新疫苗的中位时间为 6.4 年(95%置信区间:5.7-7.1 年)。国家免疫政策决策的基础评估(推荐阶段)占用了大部分获得疫苗的时间。相关性分析表明,建立了时间表并明确了疫苗评估标准的过程可以改善决策过程的效果。为了缩短新的有益疫苗的获得时间,需要了解和优化疫苗推荐、实施和供资过程。

相似文献

1
Population access to new vaccines in European countries.欧洲国家的人群获得新疫苗的途径。
Vaccine. 2013 Jun 12;31(27):2862-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
2
New vaccine adoption: qualitative study of national decision-making processes in seven low- and middle-income countries.新型疫苗采用:七个中低收入国家国家决策过程的定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 May;27 Suppl 2:ii5-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs035.
3
National Advisory Groups and their role in immunization policy-making processes in European countries.国家咨询小组及其在欧洲国家免疫政策制定过程中的作用。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Dec;19(12):1096-105. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12315. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
4
Population access to rotavirus vaccination in industrialized countries: lessons learnt from current experience.工业化国家中轮状病毒疫苗的人群可及性:从当前经验中汲取的教训
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014 Nov;13(11):1405-17. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.943194. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Comparison of NITAG policies and working processes in selected developed countries.部分发达国家国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG)政策与工作流程比较
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Systematic documentation of new vaccine introduction in selected countries of the Latin American Region.拉丁美洲区域部分国家新型疫苗引入的系统文件记录。
Vaccine. 2013 Jul 2;31 Suppl 3:C114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.032.
7
New vaccine adoption in lower-middle-income countries.中低收入国家的新型疫苗接种。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 May;27 Suppl 2:ii39-49. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs036.
8
Financing vaccinations - the South African experience.疫苗融资 - 南非的经验。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.042.
9
Decision support in vaccination policies.疫苗接种政策中的决策支持。
Vaccine. 2009 Oct 9;27(43):5923-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.105. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
10
The decision making process on new vaccines introduction in South Africa.南非引入新疫苗的决策过程。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities for and Challenges of Conducting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Meta-Analyses for Vaccines in Post-EU HTA Regulation Era.欧盟卫生技术评估法规后时代开展疫苗间接治疗比较和荟萃分析的机遇与挑战
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 11;13(2):31. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020031. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR): A decade of shaping immunization policies, 2010-2021.世界卫生组织东地中海区域(EMR)的国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAGs):塑造免疫政策的十年,2010-2021 年。
Vaccine. 2024 Jan 25;42(3):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.049. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
3
Assessing vaccine introduction and uptake timelines in Gavi-supported countries: are introduction timelines accelerating across vaccine delivery platforms?
评估 Gavi 支持国家的疫苗引入和接种时间表:疫苗接种平台的引入时间表是否在加速?
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005032.
4
Rotavirus Vaccination of Infants Delayed and Limited within the National Immunization Programme in the Netherlands: An Opportunity Lost.荷兰国家免疫规划中婴儿轮状病毒疫苗接种延迟且受限:错失的机遇
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;9(2):144. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020144.
5
The 2016 Lifetime Immunization Schedule, approved by the Italian scientific societies: A new paradigm to promote vaccination at all ages.2016 年终身免疫接种计划,获得意大利科学协会批准:在所有年龄段推广疫苗接种的新模式。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Nov 2;13(11):2531-2537. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1366394.
6
National Immunization Therapeutic Advisory Group: it is time for experience sharing and best practice learning.国家免疫治疗咨询小组:是时候进行经验分享和最佳实践学习了。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015 Sep 14;3. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v3.29276. eCollection 2015.