• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非引入新疫苗的决策过程。

The decision making process on new vaccines introduction in South Africa.

机构信息

Expanded Programme on Immunisation, National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.027
PMID:22939028
Abstract

South Africa has a functional decision making process for the introduction of new vaccines; with an established National Immunisation Technical Advisory Group (NITAG), referred to as National Advisory Group on Immunisation (NAGI). South Africa has played a leadership role in the African continent with introduction of new vaccines, which dates back to 1995 with the introduction of hepatitis B, followed by the Haemophilus influenzae type b in 1999 and recently the national roll out of the pneumococcal conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in 2009. NAGI has the responsibility to deliberate on key policy issues as part of the process for decision making on the introduction of new vaccines. In developing recommendations NAGI considers: disease burden, cost effectiveness, and the impact on the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Although guidance and recommendations from WHO are considered, the decision to introduce a new vaccine in South Africa is based on local data. NAGI recommendations are presented to the National Department of Health (NDOH). The NDOH pursues the matter further through the involvement of provinces. When an agreement has been reached to accept the NAGI recommendations, the NDOH seeks funding from the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Once funds are available, the new vaccines are implemented by the immunisation programme. Although there is an established functional system for decision making in South Africa, some areas need to be addressed. A system should be developed to allow the NDOH, NAGI and the MOF to engage in the deliberations on financial and economic impact of new vaccines. It is further recommended that a committee be established that will assess the programmatic issues to weigh the potential benefits of a new vaccine. Furthermore, political commitment should support the immunisation programme and strengthen it so that it can make an impact in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal no. 4 of reducing child mortality.

摘要

南非有一个新疫苗引入的决策制定程序,建立了国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG),称为国家免疫咨询小组(NAGI)。南非在非洲大陆发挥了领导作用,引入了新疫苗,最早可追溯到 1995 年引入乙肝疫苗,随后在 1999 年引入流感嗜血杆菌 b 疫苗,最近在 2009 年推出了肺炎球菌结合疫苗和轮状病毒疫苗。NAGI 有责任审议关键政策问题,作为新疫苗引入决策制定过程的一部分。在制定建议时,NAGI 考虑了:疾病负担、成本效益以及对扩大免疫规划(EPI)的影响。尽管考虑了世界卫生组织(WHO)的指导和建议,但南非引入新疫苗的决定是基于当地数据。NAGI 的建议提交给国家卫生部(NDOH)。NDOH 通过涉及各省来进一步探讨此事。当达成接受 NAGI 建议的协议时,NDOH 向财政部(MOF)寻求资金。一旦有资金可用,新疫苗将由免疫规划实施。尽管南非已经建立了一个功能齐全的决策制定系统,但仍有一些方面需要解决。应建立一个系统,允许 NDOH、NAGI 和 MOF 参与关于新疫苗的财务和经济影响的审议。进一步建议成立一个委员会,评估方案问题,权衡新疫苗的潜在效益。此外,政治承诺应支持免疫规划,加强免疫规划,使其能够在实现千年发展目标 4(降低儿童死亡率)方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
The decision making process on new vaccines introduction in South Africa.南非引入新疫苗的决策过程。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.027.
2
Strengthening vaccination policies in Latin America: an evidence-based approach.加强拉丁美洲的疫苗接种政策:循证方法。
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.062. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
The National Advisory Group on Immunization (NAGI) of the Republic of South Africa.南非国家免疫咨询小组(NAGI)。
Vaccine. 2010 Apr 19;28 Suppl 1:A31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.029.
4
Financing vaccinations - the South African experience.疫苗融资 - 南非的经验。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.042.
5
Rotavirus vaccination within the South African Expanded Programme on Immunisation.在南非扩大免疫规划中接种轮状病毒疫苗。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.018.
6
New vaccine adoption: qualitative study of national decision-making processes in seven low- and middle-income countries.新型疫苗采用:七个中低收入国家国家决策过程的定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 May;27 Suppl 2:ii5-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs035.
7
Meeting the need for advocacy, social mobilisation and communication in the introduction of three new vaccines in South Africa - successes and challenges.在南非引入三种新疫苗方面满足宣传、社会动员和沟通的需求——成功与挑战。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.033.
8
Financial requirements of immunisation programmes in developing countries: a 2004-2014 perspective.发展中国家免疫规划的资金需求:2004 - 2014年视角
Vaccine. 2005 Aug 31;23(37):4610-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.044.
9
Strengthening national decision-making on immunization by building capacity for economic evaluation: Implementing ProVac in Europe.通过建设经济评估能力加强国家免疫决策:在欧洲实施ProVac项目
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.073.
10
New vaccine introduction in the East and Southern African sub-region of the WHO African region in the context of GIVS and MDGs.在全球疫苗免疫联盟和千年发展目标的背景下,在世界卫生组织非洲区域东和南部非洲分区域引入新疫苗。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 7;30 Suppl 3:C3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.086.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing vaccine introduction to China's National Immunization Program: a multi-criteria decision analysis.为中国国家免疫规划确定疫苗引入的优先顺序:多标准决策分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3458. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21013-7.
2
Identifying factors that can be used to assess a country's readiness to deploy a new vaccine or improve uptake of an underutilised vaccine: a scoping review.确定可用于评估一个国家部署新疫苗或提高未充分利用疫苗接种率准备情况的因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e080370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080370.
3
COVID-19 vaccinology landscape in Africa.
非洲的 COVID-19 疫苗学领域
Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 5;13:955168. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.955168. eCollection 2022.
4
A Systematic Framework for Prioritizing Burden of Disease Data Required for Vaccine Development and Implementation: The Case for Group A Streptococcal Diseases.用于确定疫苗开发和实施所需疾病负担数据优先级的系统框架:以A群链球菌疾病为例
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 30;75(7):1245-1254. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac291.
5
Priority setting of vaccine introduction in Bangladesh: a multicriteria decision analysis study.孟加拉国疫苗引入的优先事项设定:一项多准则决策分析研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e054219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054219.
6
Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的卫生技术评估:描述性分析与叙述性综述
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 7;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5.
7
National decision-making for the introduction of new vaccines: A systematic review, 2010-2020.国家决策引进新疫苗:系统评价,2010-2020 年。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 1;39(14):1897-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.059. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Rotavirus infection in children in Southeast Asia 2008-2018: disease burden, genotype distribution, seasonality, and vaccination.2008-2018 年东南亚儿童轮状病毒感染:疾病负担、基因型分布、季节性和疫苗接种。
J Biomed Sci. 2020 May 21;27(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12929-020-00649-8.
9
Existence and functionality of national immunisation technical advisory groups in Africa from 2010 to 2016.2010 年至 2016 年期间非洲国家免疫技术咨询小组的存在和功能。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(10):2447-2451. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1475815. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Capturing Budget Impact Considerations Within Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Rotavirus Vaccine in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and a Proposed Assessment Framework.在经济评估中纳入预算影响考量:对低收入和中等收入国家轮状病毒疫苗的经济评估的系统评价和拟议评估框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jan;36(1):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0569-2.