Suppr超能文献

流感血凝素(HA)疫苗联合霍乱毒素B亚单位鼻内接种与口服或胃肠外接种的比较。

Comparison of intranasal inoculation of influenza HA vaccine combined with cholera toxin B subunit with oral or parenteral vaccination.

作者信息

Hirabayashi Y, Kurata H, Funato H, Nagamine T, Aizawa C, Tamura S, Shimada K, Kurata T

机构信息

Department of Pathology, National Institute of Health, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Vaccine. 1990 Jun;8(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(90)90053-o.

Abstract

The antibody responses to influenza virus A/PR/8/34 HA vaccine and protection against virus challenge in mice given the vaccine together with the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) intranasally were compared with those in mice given the vaccine with CTB perorally, intraperitoneally or subcutaneously. Intranasal vaccination induced remarkably higher levels of antiviral IgA antibodies in both respiratory washings and serum than did other routes of vaccination. The titres of antiviral IgG antibodies in respiratory washings and serum, and haemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies in serum, were similar after intranasal and parenteral vaccination. Oral vaccination, however, induced low levels of antiviral IgG antibodies but no detectable HI antibodies. Moreover, intranasal immunization elicited significantly higher titres of antiviral IgA antibodies in intestinal secretions in comparison with oral immunization. In contrast, parenteral immunization failed to induce these IgA antibodies. In virus challenge studies, a greater protective effect was seen after intranasal and intraperitoneal vaccination than after other routes of vaccination. These results suggest that intranasal inoculation of combined HA vaccine and CTB is superior to oral or parenteral inoculation in protecting mice. Furthermore, the intestinal antiviral IgA responses suggest that intranasal administration of CTB-combined vaccines could be effective not only against respiratory pathogens but also against enteropathogens.

摘要

将甲型流感病毒A/PR/8/34血凝素(HA)疫苗与霍乱毒素B亚单位(CTB)经鼻联合接种小鼠后,对流感病毒的抗体反应及对病毒攻击的保护作用,与经口、腹腔或皮下接种该疫苗的小鼠进行了比较。与其他接种途径相比,经鼻接种在呼吸道冲洗液和血清中诱导产生的抗病毒IgA抗体水平显著更高。经鼻接种和胃肠外接种后,呼吸道冲洗液和血清中的抗病毒IgG抗体滴度以及血清中的血凝抑制(HI)抗体滴度相似。然而,经口接种诱导产生的抗病毒IgG抗体水平较低,但未检测到HI抗体。此外,与经口免疫相比,经鼻免疫在肠道分泌物中诱导产生的抗病毒IgA抗体滴度显著更高。相比之下,胃肠外免疫未能诱导产生这些IgA抗体。在病毒攻击研究中,经鼻和腹腔接种后的保护作用比其他接种途径更强。这些结果表明,经鼻接种HA疫苗和CTB联合疫苗在保护小鼠方面优于经口或胃肠外接种。此外,肠道抗病毒IgA反应表明,经鼻接种CTB联合疫苗不仅对呼吸道病原体有效,而且对肠道病原体也有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验