• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿镰状细胞病患者的急性护理:模拟绩效评估。

Acute care of pediatric patients with sickle cell disease: a simulation performance assessment.

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Doris Duke Clinical Research Fellowship, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Sep;60(9):1492-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24558. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.24558
PMID:23633232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a rare disorder with cardinal features including hospitalization for vaso-occlusive pain episodes, acute pulmonary injury, and increased infection rates. For physician-trainees, learning optimal SCD management is challenging because of limited exposure to life threatening complications requiring timely interventions.

PROCEDURE

To create, demonstrate reliability, and validate simulation-based, acute care SCD scenarios for physician-trainees, seven scenarios were derived from SCD patient cases. For each scenario, participants had 5 minutes to complete diagnostic and treatment interventions. Participants were divided into two groups based on clinical experience: interns or residents/fellows. Two raters scored performances using diagnostic and therapeutic checklists--indicating whether specific actions were performed and a global, 1 (poor) to 9 (excellent), rating. Scenario scores were calculated by averaging rater scores on each metric. Reliability was defined through uniformity in rater scoring and consistency of participant performance over scenarios. Validity was demonstrated by the performance gradient where the more experienced trainees outperform those early in training.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight pediatric residents and hematology fellows took part in the study. Reliability for assessment scores overall was moderate. Performance on all but one scenario was moderately predictive of overall performance. Senior resident/fellows performed significantly better than interns. Positive associations existed between overall performance scores (P < 0.01) and months of postgraduate training (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mannequin-based simulation is a novel method for teaching pediatric residents SCD-specific acute care skills. The assessment provided reliable and valid measures of trainees' performance. Further studies are needed to determine simulation's utility in education and evaluation.

摘要

背景

镰状细胞病(SCD)是一种罕见的疾病,其主要特征包括血管阻塞性疼痛发作、急性肺损伤和感染率增加。对于医师培训生来说,由于接触到需要及时干预的危及生命的并发症的机会有限,因此学习最佳的 SCD 管理方法具有挑战性。

方法

为了为医师培训生创建、证明可靠性并验证基于模拟的急性护理 SCD 场景,从 SCD 患者病例中得出了七个场景。对于每个场景,参与者有 5 分钟的时间来完成诊断和治疗干预。根据临床经验,参与者分为两组:实习生或住院医师/研究员。两名评分员使用诊断和治疗清单对表现进行评分,表明是否执行了特定操作以及 1(差)至 9(优)的整体评分。通过在每个指标上平均评分员的评分来计算场景分数。可靠性是通过评分员评分的一致性和参与者在场景中的一致性来定义的。通过表现梯度来证明有效性,即经验丰富的培训生表现优于早期培训的培训生。

结果

28 名儿科住院医师和血液学研究员参加了这项研究。评估分数的可靠性总体上是中等的。除了一个场景之外,所有场景的表现都对整体表现具有中等预测性。高级住院医师/研究员的表现明显优于实习生。总体表现得分之间存在正相关(P<0.01),与毕业后培训的月份之间存在正相关(P<0.01)。

结论

基于人体模型的模拟是一种教授儿科住院医师 SCD 特定急性护理技能的新方法。该评估提供了对学员表现的可靠和有效的衡量标准。需要进一步的研究来确定模拟在教育和评估中的效用。

相似文献

1
Acute care of pediatric patients with sickle cell disease: a simulation performance assessment.小儿镰状细胞病患者的急性护理:模拟绩效评估。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Sep;60(9):1492-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24558. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.Boot cAMP:在实习开始时进行连续 4 年基于模拟的预备培训后的教育成果。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.007.
3
Setting performance standards for mannequin-based acute-care scenarios: an examinee-centered approach.为基于人体模型的急性护理场景设定性能标准:以考生为中心的方法。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Summer;3(2):72-81. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31816e39e2.
4
Simulation-based assessment to identify critical gaps in safe anesthesia resident performance.基于模拟的评估,以确定安全麻醉住院医师表现中的关键差距。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Jan;120(1):129-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000055.
5
Simulation training with structured debriefing improves residents' pediatric disaster triage performance.带结构化讨论的模拟训练可提高住院医师儿科灾难分诊能力。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Jun;27(3):239-44. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000775. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
The management of sickle cell pain in the emergency department: a priority for health systems.急诊科镰状细胞疼痛的管理:卫生系统的优先事项。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Jan;29(1):60-3. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318245764b.
7
Nonsurgical airway management training for surgeons.面向外科医生的非手术气道管理培训。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.03.001.
8
Development and evaluation of high-fidelity simulation case scenarios for pediatric resident education.用于儿科住院医师教育的高保真模拟病例场景的开发与评估。
Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.12.005.
9
External validation of simulation-based assessments with other performance measures of third-year anesthesiology residents.将基于模拟的评估与三年级麻醉住院医师的其他绩效评估进行外部验证。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Apr;7(2):73-80. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823d018a.
10
Simulating various levels of clinical challenge in the assessment of clinical procedure competence.模拟各种临床挑战水平,评估临床操作能力。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):112-20.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.036. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Confidence, and Comfort Regarding Sickle Cell Disease Among Medical Students: A Pilot Study in Two Universities.医学生对镰状细胞病的认知、信心与舒适度:在两所大学开展的一项试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(15):1909. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151909.
2
Assessment of medical students' clinical performance using high-fidelity simulation: comparison of peer and instructor assessment.使用高保真模拟评估医学生的临床表现:同伴评估与教师评估的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02952-w.
3
Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review.
卫生专业教育中基于模拟的评估:一项系统综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Feb 22;9:69-82. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S92695. eCollection 2016.