• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响特定语言障碍诊断中标准化测试选择的因素。

Factors influencing the selection of standardized tests for the diagnosis of specific language impairment.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Apr;44(2):133-46. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0093).

DOI:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0093)
PMID:23633640
Abstract

PURPOSE

Standardized tests are one of the primary assessment tools used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to diagnose child language impairment. Numerous child language tests are commercially available; however, it is unknown what factors lead clinicians to select particular tests to use in clinical practice. This study investigated whether the quality of standardized tests, as measured by the test's psychometric properties, is related to how frequently the tests are used in clinical practice.

METHOD

A total of 364 SLPs completed a survey regarding how frequently they used specific standardized tests when diagnosing suspected specific language impairment (SLI). The test manuals for 55 tests were reviewed to determine whether test characteristics, such as test reliability, validity, and accuracy, correlated with the frequency of test use.

RESULTS

The most frequently used standardized tests were omnibus measures (e.g., Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fourth Edition [Semel, Wiig, & Secord, 2003], Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition [Zimmerman, Steiner, & Pond, 2002]) and single-word vocabulary measures (e.g., Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition [Dunn & Dunn, 2007]). Publication year was the only test characteristic that correlated significantly with the frequency of test use.

CONCLUSION

The quality of a standardized test, as measured by the test's psychometric properties, does not appear to influence how frequently a test is used. These results highlight the need for increased evidence-based practice when diagnosing children with language impairment.

摘要

目的

标准化测试是言语语言病理学家(SLP)用于诊断儿童语言障碍的主要评估工具之一。有许多儿童语言测试可供商业使用;然而,尚不清楚哪些因素导致临床医生选择特定的测试用于临床实践。本研究调查了标准化测试的质量(以测试的心理测量特性来衡量)是否与测试在临床实践中的使用频率有关。

方法

共有 364 名 SLP 完成了一项关于他们在诊断疑似特定语言障碍(SLI)时使用特定标准化测试的频率的调查。审查了 55 项测试的测试手册,以确定测试特性(如测试可靠性、有效性和准确性)是否与测试使用频率相关。

结果

最常使用的标准化测试是综合测试(例如,《临床语言评估基础第四版》[Semel、Wiig 和 Secord,2003]、《学前语言量表第四版》[Zimmerman、Steiner 和 Pond,2002])和单个单词词汇测试(例如,《Peabody 图片词汇测试第四版》[Dunn 和 Dunn,2007])。出版年份是唯一与测试使用频率显著相关的测试特征。

结论

标准化测试的质量(以测试的心理测量特性来衡量)似乎不会影响测试的使用频率。这些结果强调了在诊断语言障碍儿童时需要增加基于证据的实践。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing the selection of standardized tests for the diagnosis of specific language impairment.影响特定语言障碍诊断中标准化测试选择的因素。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Apr;44(2):133-46. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0093).
2
Norm-Referenced Language Test Selection Practices for Elementary School Children With Suspected Developmental Language Disorder.常模参照语言测试在疑似发展性语言障碍的小学生中的选择实践。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Jan 19;52(1):288-303. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00067. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
3
The cultural appropriateness and diagnostic usefulness of standardized language assessments for Indigenous Australian children.针对澳大利亚原住民儿童的标准化语言评估的文化适宜性和诊断效用。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Aug;15(4):429-40. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.762043. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
4
Using norm-referenced tests to determine severity of language impairment in children: disconnect between U.S. policy makers and test developers.使用常模参照测试来确定儿童语言障碍的严重程度:美国政策制定者和测试开发者之间的脱节。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2012 Apr;43(2):176-90. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0103). Epub 2012 Jan 23.
5
The development and validation of the Short Language Measure (SLaM): A brief measure of general language ability for children in their first year at school.短语言量表(SLaM)的制定与验证:一种针对入学第一年儿童的一般语言能力的简要测量工具。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):345-358. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12522. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Contribution of family environment to pediatric cochlear implant users' speech and language outcomes: some preliminary findings.家庭环境对儿童人工耳蜗使用者言语和语言康复效果的影响:一些初步发现。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):848-64. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0143). Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
[Phenotyping specific language impairment in kindergarten children].[幼儿园儿童特定语言障碍的表型分析]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Apr;89(4):216-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242795. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
8
The revision decision: is change always good? A comparison of CELF-R and CELF-3 test scores in children with language impairment, focal brain damage, and typical development.修订决策:改变总是好的吗?语言障碍、局灶性脑损伤及发育正常儿童的CELF-R和CELF-3测试分数比较
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Jul;38(3):182-9. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/019).
9
The relationship between standardized measures of language and measures of spontaneous speech in children with autism.自闭症儿童语言标准化测量与自发言语测量之间的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003 Aug;12(3):349-58. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/080).
10
Comorbidity of auditory processing, language, and reading disorders.听觉处理、语言和阅读障碍的共病情况。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Jun;52(3):706-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0226). Epub 2008 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Word Reading and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.发育性语言障碍儿童的单词阅读与注意缺陷多动障碍
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):1324-1340. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00052. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives on Language Assessment in Bilingual Children.言语语言病理学家对双语儿童语言评估的观点。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2025 Jul 16;56(3):646-665. doi: 10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00145. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Is Knowing Words Enough? Assessing Vocabulary in Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.
只认识单词就够了吗?评估失聪或听力有障碍儿童的词汇量。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2025 Apr 10;56(2):252-266. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00046. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
4
Approaches towards pragmatic language assessment in Indian pre-schoolers: A survey among speech-language pathologists.印度学前儿童实用语言评估方法:言语语言病理学家的调查。
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 1;13:865. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154514.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Genome-Wide Mapping of Consanguineous Families Confirms Previously Implicated Gene Loci and Suggests New Loci in Specific Language Impairment (SLI).近亲家族的全基因组图谱证实了先前涉及特定语言障碍(SLI)的基因座,并提示了新的基因座。
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;11(9):1063. doi: 10.3390/children11091063.
6
Links Among Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Psycholinguistic Abilities Are Different for Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.患有和未患有发育性语言障碍的儿童,注意缺陷多动障碍症状与心理语言能力之间的联系有所不同。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Sep 18;33(5):2344-2363. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00388. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Urdu Receptive Language Scale (URLS): Modification & development of protocol for administration in Urdu.乌尔都语接受性语言量表(URLS):乌尔都语施测方案的修订与开发
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 May-Jun;40(5):884-890. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.5.7471.
8
Sentence Production and Sentence Repetition in Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults: Linguistic Sensitivity to Finiteness Marking.自闭症青少年和成年人的句子生成和句子重复:对限定标记的语言敏感性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2297-2315. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00028. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
Sentence production and sentence repetition in autistic adolescents and young adults: Linguistic sensitivity to finiteness-marking.自闭症青少年和青年的句子生成与句子重复:对限定性标记的语言敏感性。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 28:2024.03.26.24304924. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.26.24304924.
10
Studies assessing domains pertaining to structural language in autism vary in reporting practices and approaches to assessment: A systematic review.研究评估自闭症结构语言领域的报告实践和评估方法存在差异:系统综述。
Autism. 2024 Jul;28(7):1602-1621. doi: 10.1177/13623613231216155. Epub 2023 Dec 25.