University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Palliative Care, Dallas, TX 75390-8889, USA.
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jan;9(1):e8-12. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000595.
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are often used in place of mediport catheters because of cost and lack of operating room time and to prevent delays in therapy. One common complication associated with their use is upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT). The purpose of this study was to ascertain risk factors associated with an increased risk of PICC-associated UEVT in patients with cancer.
Retrospective analysis identified 237 patients with cancer who received PICCs at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 2006 to 2009. We analyzed many risk factors, including PICC infection (PI), use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), antiplatelet agents (APAs), treatment dose anticoagulation (TDA), and bevacizumab.
Of 237 patients, 36 (15%) were found to have UEVT. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed risk factors positively associated with UEVT were use of ESAs (odds ratio [OR], 10.66; 95% CI, 2.25 to 50.49), hospitalization (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.39), PI (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.86), and TDA (OR, 8.34; 95% CI, 2.98 to 23.33), whereas patients receiving APAs had a lower risk of UEVT (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.92).
Specific factors significantly increase the risk of UEVT in patients with cancer with PICCs, whereas use of APAs seems to have a protective effect against UEVT. These results may aid in the development of a predictive model for identifying patients at high risk of UEVT who may benefit from APAs, as well as in determining preventive strategies for reducing the risk of PICC-associated UEVT.
与使用医疗港导管相比,外周插入中心导管(PICC)通常由于成本和缺乏手术室时间以及为了防止治疗延误而被使用,以预防上肢静脉血栓形成(UEVT)。其使用相关的常见并发症之一是上肢静脉血栓形成(UEVT)。本研究旨在确定与癌症患者 PICC 相关 UEVT 风险增加相关的危险因素。
回顾性分析 2006 年至 2009 年期间在达拉斯退伍军人事务医疗中心接受 PICC 的 237 例癌症患者。我们分析了许多危险因素,包括 PICC 感染(PI)、使用促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)、抗血小板药物(APAs)、治疗剂量抗凝(TDA)和贝伐单抗。
在 237 例患者中,发现 36 例(15%)患有 UEVT。逐步逻辑回归分析显示,与 UEVT 呈正相关的危险因素包括使用 ESAs(比值比[OR],10.66;95%CI,2.25 至 50.49)、住院(OR,2.38;95%CI,1.05 至 5.39)、PI(OR,2.46;95%CI,1.03 至 5.86)和 TDA(OR,8.34;95%CI,2.98 至 23.33),而使用 APA 的患者 UEVT 的风险较低(OR,0.25;95%CI,0.07 至 0.92)。
特定因素显著增加了癌症患者 PICC 相关 UEVT 的风险,而 APA 的使用似乎对 UEVT 具有保护作用。这些结果可能有助于制定预测模型,以识别 UEVT 风险较高的患者,他们可能受益于 APA,以及确定降低 PICC 相关 UEVT 风险的预防策略。