Western Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2111 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2013 Mar;23(2):301-10. doi: 10.1890/11-1638.1.
As a vector by which foreign species invade coastal and freshwater waterbodies, ballast water discharge from ships is recognized as a major environmental threat. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) drafted an international treaty establishing ballast water discharge standards based on the number of viable organisms per volume of ballast discharge for different organism size classes. Concerns that the IMO standards are not sufficiently protective have initiated several state and national efforts in the United States to develop more stringent standards. We evaluated seven approaches to establishing discharge standards for the > 50-microm size class: (1) expert opinion/management consensus, (2) zero detectable living organisms, (3) natural invasion rates, (4) reaction-diffusion models, (5) population viability analysis (PVA) models, (6) per capita invasion probabilities (PCIP), and (7) experimental studies. Because of the difficulty in synthesizing scientific knowledge in an unbiased and transparent fashion, we recommend the use of quantitative models instead of expert opinion. The actual organism concentration associated with a "zero detectable organisms" standard is defined by the statistical rigor of its monitoring program; thus it is not clear whether such a standard is as stringent as other standards. For several reasons, the natural invasion rate, reaction-diffusion, and experimental approaches are not considered suitable for generating discharge standards. PVA models can be used to predict the likelihood of establishment of introduced species but are limited by a lack of population vital rates for species characteristic of ballast water discharges. Until such rates become available, PVA models are better suited to evaluate relative efficiency of proposed standards rather than predicting probabilities of invasion. The PCIP approach, which is based on historical invasion rates at a regional scale, appears to circumvent many of the indicated problems, although it may underestimate invasions by asexual and parthenogenic species. Further research is needed to better define propagule dose-responses, densities at which Allee effects occur, approaches to predicting the likelihood of invasion from multi-species introductions, and generation of formal comparisons of approaches using standardized scenarios.
作为外来物种入侵沿海和淡水水体的载体,船舶压载水的排放被认为是一种主要的环境威胁。国际海事组织(IMO)起草了一项国际条约,根据不同生物体大小类别的每体积压载水排放中存活生物体的数量,制定了压载水排放标准。由于 IMO 标准不够保护,美国已经采取了几项州和国家措施,以制定更严格的标准。我们评估了为 >50 微米大小类别的排放制定标准的七种方法:(1)专家意见/管理共识,(2)零可检测活生物体,(3)自然入侵率,(4)反应扩散模型,(5)种群生存力分析(PVA)模型,(6)人均入侵概率(PCIP)和(7)实验研究。由于难以以公正和透明的方式综合科学知识,因此我们建议使用定量模型而不是专家意见。与“零可检测生物体”标准相关的实际生物体浓度由其监测计划的统计严格程度定义;因此,不清楚这样的标准是否与其他标准一样严格。由于几个原因,自然入侵率、反应扩散和实验方法不适合生成排放标准。PVA 模型可用于预测引入物种建立的可能性,但受到与压载水排放特征的物种的种群生命率缺乏的限制。在获得此类速率之前,PVA 模型更适合评估拟议标准的相对效率,而不是预测入侵的可能性。PCIP 方法基于区域尺度的历史入侵率,似乎规避了许多表明的问题,尽管它可能低估了无性和孤雌生殖物种的入侵。需要进一步研究,以更好地定义繁殖体剂量反应、出现阿利效应的密度、从多物种引入预测入侵可能性的方法,以及使用标准化情景生成方法的正式比较。